[squid-users] Re: kid2| WARNING: disk-cache maximum object size is unlimited but mem-cache maximum object size is 32.00 KB

2013-10-28 Thread Ahmad
hi all , nice to tell you that i found the solution of this problem my problem was when i want to shutdown squid , i repeat squid -k shutdown many times !!! thats why a conflict occurs when i start squid let it get down !! agian , the solution , is , if i want to restart squid i have to

[squid-users] wccp dont work with smp i i used cache dir rock !!! ?????

2013-10-28 Thread Ahmad
hi , im using last 3.3.9 stabe version compiled ! if i finish an error in squid , i must see another error instantaneously , seems squid hate me !!! the problem is , when i use rock cache dir , the wccp dont work with squid !!! if i remove cache dir rock from backend.conf , the wccp

[squid-users] why wccp config with smp must be put in backend.conf ???

2013-10-28 Thread Ahmad
hi , all im wondering , i have followed example of : http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/SmpCarpCluster my question is , why the wccp config dont work if it was put in fronted.conf why it only work if i put it in backed.conf ??? i read about backend.conf , we put in it the heavy

Re: [squid-users] why wccp config with smp must be put in backend.conf ???

2013-10-28 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 28/10/2013 8:10 p.m., Ahmad wrote: hi , all im wondering , i have followed example of : http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/SmpCarpCluster my question is , why the wccp config dont work if it was put in fronted.conf why it only work if i put it in backed.conf ??? Same reason

Re: [squid-users] Re: squid with muliwan

2013-10-28 Thread Marcello Romani
Il 26/10/2013 16:43, adamso ha scritto: Thanks for the replies, Marcello Romani i tried it. But le problème, when i broke eth0:1 on the pfsense gateway, i still have connexion. E.g : on my squid, yahoo mail go to eth0:1 par tcp_outgoing_ address. But when i broke eth0:1, i can go to yahoo mail.

[squid-users] Re: why wccp config with smp must be put in backend.conf ???

2013-10-28 Thread Ahmad
hi amos , with wccp2_rebuild_wait off not wccp_rebuild_wait off squid with wccp worked now , but i must put this configs in backend.conf !! it dont work if i put it in frontend.conf !!! ? - Dr.x -- View this message in context:

[squid-users] Re: SQUID in TPROXY - do not resolve

2013-10-28 Thread Ahmad
@plamen , regards to 1st discussion now i tried trpoxy squid i pointed squid to dns1 and put on my pc dns2 my pc resolved the site aaa.com with 1.1.1.1 and squid resolved aaa.com with 2.2.2.2 but my pc see the site with 1.1.1.1 not with 2.2.2.2 ??? why ? shouldn't my pc see the site

[squid-users] Re: why wccp config with smp must be put in backend.conf ???

2013-10-28 Thread Ahmad
hi Amos , agian , the cache.log says : with my config above , and when wccp worked with rock type , i have logs as below !!! *clientProcessHit: Vary object loop! Oops. Not a Vary object on second attempt* = 2013/10/28 10:21:31 kid1|

[squid-users] Re: something not being understood in ,workers , squid proces , cores mapping

2013-10-28 Thread Ahmad
hi , alex amos , thanks very much for clarification , but im wondering why this info you posted here is not found on the wiki !!! agian , i have 3 workers 3 rock disk so = 3 disker process 3 worker prcoess i have 1 coordinator process 1 master squid process

Re: [squid-users] Re: SQUID in TPROXY - do not resolve

2013-10-28 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 28/10/2013 9:46 p.m., Ahmad wrote: @plamen , regards to 1st discussion now i tried trpoxy squid i pointed squid to dns1 and put on my pc dns2 my pc resolved the site aaa.com with 1.1.1.1 and squid resolved aaa.com with 2.2.2.2 but my pc see the site with 1.1.1.1 not with 2.2.2.2

Re: AW: [squid-users] Vary object loop

2013-10-28 Thread Ahmad
hi , could this be harmfull problem , ?? i mean can i ignore it and deal with my suqid as it works normally ? regards - Dr.x -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Vary-object-loop-tp4662627p4662969.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing

Re: [squid-users] Re: SQUID in TPROXY - do not resolve

2013-10-28 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 25/10/2013 2:44 a.m., Plamen wrote: Amos Jeffries-2 wrote On 24/10/2013 6:44 a.m., Plamen wrote: Yes, this is one of the problems I'm also experiencing, the customer is using different DNS than the Squid, and he complains because he says - without your SQUID I can open web page, but

Re: [squid-users] Re: something not being understood in ,workers , squid proces , cores mapping

2013-10-28 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 28/10/2013 10:18 p.m., Ahmad wrote: hi , alex amos , thanks very much for clarification , but im wondering why this info you posted here is not found on the wiki !!! The features are new and volatile, not everything is documented yet. Most of these details are in the wiki, just hidden

Re: AW: [squid-users] Vary object loop

2013-10-28 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 28/10/2013 11:37 p.m., Ahmad wrote: hi , could this be harmfull problem , ?? i mean can i ignore it and deal with my suqid as it works normally ? regards If it is happening often that probably should be looked into. It happens from time to time though anyway. Amos

Re: AW: [squid-users] Vary object loop

2013-10-28 Thread Ahmad
oh , it seems bad news for me ! - Dr.x -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Vary-object-loop-tp4662627p4662973.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: AW: [squid-users] Vary object loop

2013-10-28 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 29/10/2013 12:23 a.m., Ahmad wrote: oh , it seems bad news for me ! Not too bad. Squid is self-correcting since we (devs) know exactly what state is happening and can detect it. But how Squid got into that state in the first place is still a mystery. What it means for production traffic

[squid-users] Problem with negotiate_wrapper and ntlm authentication

2013-10-28 Thread Matteo De Lazzari
Dear all, I have a little problem trying to configure a fall back authentication via negotiate_wrapper Here is the squid configuration line: auth_param negotiate program /usr/local/bin/negotiate_wrapper -d --ntlm /usr/bin/ntlm_auth -d --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp --domain=PREVIDOM

Re: [squid-users] Re: something not being understood in ,workers , squid proces , cores mapping

2013-10-28 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 10/28/2013 03:18 AM, Ahmad wrote: hi , alex amos , thanks very much for clarification , but im wondering why this info you posted here is not found on the wiki Primarily because nobody took the time to write it up and post it there. It is there now:

Re: [squid-users] Re: 3x cpu usage after upgrade 3.1.20 to 3.3.8

2013-10-28 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 10/27/2013 03:03 AM, Omid Kosari wrote: Everything is same as before . I have 2 squid boxes . one of them has rock , another even doesn't has rock . just upgraded and both boxes has increased cpu usage . For each of those 2 squid boxes, can you post a top snapshot showing (a) all CPU

[squid-users] Problem with negotiate_wrapper and ntlm authentication

2013-10-28 Thread Matteo De Lazzari
Dear all, I have a little problem trying to configure a fall back authentication via negotiate_wrapper Here is the squid configuration line: auth_param negotiate program /usr/local/bin/negotiate_wrapper -d --ntlm /usr/bin/ntlm_auth -d --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp --domain=PREVIDOM

[squid-users] Re: transparent proxy on remote box issue

2013-10-28 Thread WorkingMan
That line above the headers is showing the problem: HTTP Client local=SQUID IP:3130 remote=VPN server:65090 FD 10 flags=1 local= contains the details of www.nba.com server where the request is being fetched original dst IP:port from the TCP packets. remote= contains the client

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.4.0.2 + smp + rock storage error

2013-10-28 Thread Ricardo Klein
Amos, in some way I did something wrong with those permissions (I checked them before post here, but, dont know why I didnt saw that they where wrong). Anyway, working 3.4.0.2 on Slackware 14.1 (rc2) with 2 workers and rock storage. Next test will be with CentOS 6.4 + NTLM authentication and

[squid-users] one dansguardian, multiple squids

2013-10-28 Thread Fred Maranhão
is there a way to configure my dansguardian to use more than one squid as backend proxy? I have plans to have multiple dansguardians and multiples squid, but by now I want to test one dansguardian and multiples squid.

[squid-users] Re: why wccp config with smp must be put in backend.conf ???

2013-10-28 Thread Ahmad
hi amos , ive pumped about 200 users to squid , and there were a lot of frequent logs that say : http://www.gstatic.com/bg/cBsqIKQy8Z-2rJQ_TZ58t_YGnEGmYguE3xgHQUEDAYw.js' 'accept-encoding=gzip,%20deflate' 2013/10/28 21:00:10 kid1| clientProcessHit: Vary object loop! 2013/10/28 21:00:10 kid1|

[squid-users] Re: why wccp config with smp must be put in backend.conf ???

2013-10-28 Thread Ahmad
hi amos , i note that it only on kid1 and i have no i/o on my cache rock dirs not tcp_hit !! also i noted that it occurs on js , xml files - Dr.x -- View this message in context:

RE: [squid-users] one dansguardian, multiple squids

2013-10-28 Thread Rafael Akchurin
Hello Fred, Not sure about Dansguardian (possibly configure it as parent proxy for all Squids) but ICAP server qlproxy that does the same web filtering as DansGuardian but within Squid (coupled through ICAP protocol) will do the job nicely. Just install it on a separate server and direct all

[squid-users] Squid 3.1 with Tproxy and WCCP on Cisco 3550

2013-10-28 Thread mudasirmirza
Hi, I am working on setting up Squid 3.1 with Tproxy using WCCP on Cisco 3550. Configs that I am using is below Router and Proxy both are on Public IPs, traffic coming in from clients are also Public IP But for some reason the Router Identifier IP is showing as Local IP which is being used to

[squid-users] Re: Squid 3.1 with Tproxy and WCCP on Cisco 3550

2013-10-28 Thread Dr.x
hi , you are having tproxy , so you cant use well know service in this case in your case above, u need to define two wccp services . so , you wccp setting will be similar to : === wccp2_router x.x.x.x wccp_version 2 wccp2_forwarding_method 2

[squid-users] Re: something not being understood in ,workers , squid proces , cores mapping

2013-10-28 Thread Dr.x
hi alex , im happy to hear that from you nice update on wiki . regards - Dr.x -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/something-not-being-understood-in-workers-squid-proces-cores-mapping-tp4662942p4662990.html Sent from the Squid - Users

Re: [squid-users] Problem with negotiate_wrapper and ntlm authentication

2013-10-28 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 29/10/2013 6:19 a.m., Matteo De Lazzari wrote: Dear all, I have a little problem trying to configure a fall back authentication via negotiate_wrapper snip I'm using a precompiled 3.1.10 squid version on centos 6.4. Please try a current Squid version (3.3 or later). There seems to be