Am 29.01.2014 21:51, schrieb Amos Jeffries:
On 2014-01-30 03:48, Amon Ott wrote:
We have a setup with a single parent proxy that shall be used for all
requests. never_direct allow all ensures that the parent is not to be
bypassed. Still, every request leads to an extra unnecessary (and
Hi Alex,
I have unified my mods in one single file patch, I also have the
configure output, but I see that the bug 3975 is closed.
So my question is, where can I post my proposed patch?
I solved the compile issue removing the -Werror flag (I know that this
isn't a good practice) now I am
On 30/01/2014 9:25 p.m., Amon Ott wrote:
Am 29.01.2014 21:51, schrieb Amos Jeffries:
On 2014-01-30 03:48, Amon Ott wrote:
We have a setup with a single parent proxy that shall be used for all
requests. never_direct allow all ensures that the parent is not to be
bypassed. Still, every request
Guten Morgen ! :-)
In worst
case I would have to run a cron job updating the host entry every minute
or such - sounds horrible.
As far as I understand, you have two problems:
1) squids strategy to find best parent using DNS
2) dynamically changing parents IP
First one should be solvable by a
Am 30.01.2014 10:45, schrieb Amos Jeffries:
On 30/01/2014 9:25 p.m., Amon Ott wrote:
Am 29.01.2014 21:51, schrieb Amos Jeffries:
On 2014-01-30 03:48, Amon Ott wrote:
We have a setup with a single parent proxy that shall be used for all
requests. never_direct allow all ensures that the parent
On 30/01/2014 11:52 p.m., Amon Ott wrote:
Am 30.01.2014 10:45, schrieb Amos Jeffries:
On 30/01/2014 9:25 p.m., Amon Ott wrote:
Am 29.01.2014 21:51, schrieb Amos Jeffries:
On 2014-01-30 03:48, Amon Ott wrote:
We have a setup with a single parent proxy that shall be used for all
requests.
Am 30.01.2014 12:24, schrieb Amos Jeffries:
On 30/01/2014 11:52 p.m., Amon Ott wrote:
Am 30.01.2014 10:45, schrieb Amos Jeffries:
On 30/01/2014 9:25 p.m., Amon Ott wrote:
Am 29.01.2014 21:51, schrieb Amos Jeffries:
On 2014-01-30 03:48, Amon Ott wrote:
We have a setup with a single parent
Peter
You do not by any chance have EBtables (bridge iptables) enabled do
you? Maybe you have a ACL there that is in the way?
Madhav
-Original Message-
From: Peter Warasin pe...@endian.com
To: Madhav V Diwan mdi...@diwanconsulting.com
Subject: Re: [squid-users] TPROXY does not
Hi.
You could tell me the official repository of squid, so I can install it
from the command apt-get install. -/etc/apt/source.list
because when I try to install it from, make install, it fails.
Me distribution is Ubuntu 12.4.3
Thanks
On 2014-01-31 10:22, Jeank Melendez wrote:
Hi.
You could tell me the official repository of squid, so I can install it
from the command apt-get install. -/etc/apt/source.list
because when I try to install it from, make install, it fails.
Me distribution is Ubuntu 12.4.3
Squid for Ubuntu is
Hi,
I am considering switching to authentication via a web page. Are
there examples of how to do this somewhere? What are the pros and
cons of this configuration? I am very concerned about security with
web page authentication.
Also, I am not really sure if it is a good idea. For
Hello,
I request a page directly from my server and all works fine.
Same request through Squid as a reverse proxy I get a timeout.
Squid version is 2.7.STABLE8 running on Windows 7 64-bit.
The request is pretty standard:
GET
Could it be related to Host header mismatch? In your direct example it
is localhost, but when routed via squid it will become couchdb. You
can add forceddomain=localhost parameter in your cache_peer directive
in order to fix it.
Hope this helps!
Best,
Niki
P.S. I assume you run both Squid and
On 31/01/2014 12:29 p.m., Boaz Citrin wrote:
Hello,
I request a page directly from my server and all works fine.
Same request through Squid as a reverse proxy I get a timeout.
Squid version is 2.7.STABLE8 running on Windows 7 64-bit.
The request is pretty standard:
GET
14 matches
Mail list logo
