I have a few teachers how want a group of students to be forwarded to
a page for certain sites. The page would then have forwarding option
to view the original site. They are trying to add around 100 URL's to
this list. For example, if student tries to access loc.gov site, they
would be redirected
Thanks, Amos. I don't understand why their implementation is many
times faster than mine unless my Squid is horribly (mis)configured.
Is there anything in this config that would slow down Squid?
http_port 3128
refresh_pattern http://.*\.adobe\.com/ 0 80% 20160 reload-into-ims
refresh_pattern
to get to the bottom of it...
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:32 PM, - Mikael - funactivit...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Amos. I don't understand why their implementation is many
times faster than mine unless my Squid is horribly (mis)configured.
Is there anything in this config that would slow down
That sounds like heap LRU policy,
it is not fear to compare a squid out of the box with a solution that
has a tunning in parameters. Pesonally, i've develop an algorithm to
save you 30% of bandwith with some tunnings based on statistical
measures. So it is easy, you dont have to waste
Could you name this product and point at some documentation it has about
this process?
Its called Untangle. Its a Debian based distro with Squid based web
caching app.
FAQ about caching app with some tech details is available at:
wiki.untangle.com/index.php/Web_Cache_FAQs
Our school dept wants to buy a commercial proxy (Squid based) which
seems to work a whole lot faster than the standard installation (of
Squid). The performance difference between the two Squid's seems to be
in how commercial Squid implementation is handling a missed object.
From what I understand
What are the benefits of having Squid on the LAN?
Our firewall (Sonicwall NSA) explicitly forbids proxies on the LAN for
some reason.
The firewall will forward all traffic to Squid only if its on public IP address.
This is how we are setup right now:
(LAN) - (Sonicwall firewall, NAT, DPI, DHCP)
I'm not sure what to make out of these stats.
Is there anything here that I should pay attention to and possible
correct the config file to do it better?
Squid Object Cache: Version 3.1.6
Start Time: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:39:04 GMT
Current Time: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:20:31 GMT
Connection
What is the best http_port directive to use in this scenario?
Squid has a public IP.
All clients are behind NAT firewall with public IP.
Firewall sends all NATed client traffic to Squid.
Squid fetches the site, returns the hit back to the firewall which
then forwards it to appropriate clients.
Is there a cleaner and more effective way to use these
refresh_patterns? This is what I have so far.
I would love to cache more of FLV content and specific sites that get
lots of traffics, such as yahoo and news.google.com
refresh_pattern -i \.flv$ 10080 90% 99 ignore-no-cache
Two quick questions:
I have big latency on the Squid box. It takes about 5 seconds from the
time I enter URL address until the page loads. When the page loads it
loads very quickly.
DNS queries to WAN are 2ms, average ISP tracert and ping latencies
are around 20ms. Tracert and ping from LAN to
11 matches
Mail list logo
