Re: [squid-users] --foreground vs -N

in my question(s); greatly appreciated. On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:14 PM Alex Rousskov wrote: > > On 9/18/19 3:37 PM, B. Cook wrote: > > > this is /dev/shm with --foreground (no workers) > > > -rw--- 1 proxy proxy8 2019-09-18 10:30 squid-cf__metadata.shm > >

Re: [squid-users] --foreground vs -N

Thank you for the response.. Confused what you mean.. this is /dev/shm with --foreground (no workers) root:/dev/shm # ls -al total 12 drwxrwxrwt 2 root root 100 2019-09-18 10:30 . drwxr-xr-x 17 root root 3120 2019-09-17 09:08 .. -rw--- 1 proxy proxy8 2019-09-18 10:30

[squid-users] --foreground vs -N

tl;dr: is there any functional difference between the two? Using runit to handle my squid processes. I have Observium graphing system information. My data/traffic is consistent In my run file I changed from squid -N to squid --foreground #!/bin/sh -e exec \ chpst -o 131070 \ chpst -e ./env

Re: [squid-users] dead gateway, not dead peer..

se try the request again.​ On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > On 23/06/2016 2:00 a.m., B. Cook wrote: > > ... > > > > What can I do about it? > > > > (thank you for working through understanding the problem..) &g

Re: [squid-users] dead gateway, not dead peer..

... What can I do about it? (thank you for working through understanding the problem..) On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > On 23/06/2016 1:25 a.m., B. Cook wrote: > > ​when the one of the proxies loses its internet connection.. the de

Re: [squid-users] dead gateway, not dead peer..

TO the outside is dead and gone. That is what I am trying to fix.. When a cache_peer has a connectivity problem.. On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > On 22/06/2016 7:12 a.m., B. Cook wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Amos Jeffries <sq

Re: [squid-users] dead gateway, not dead peer..

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > So you're trolling. The FAQ it is then: > > > > ​Thank you the response.. squid.conf (3.5.19 debian host

Re: [squid-users] dead gateway, not dead peer..

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Antony Stone < antony.st...@squid.open.source.it> wrote: > > > Please answer the following questions: > > 1. How many squid servers do you have (in this setup)? > ​ I have three squid servers ​ > > 2. What are their IP addresses? > ​172.16.0.30/20 - Oasis,

[squid-users] dead gateway, not dead peer..

Looking for a second opinion.. I think this is beyond the scope of squid, but I figured I would ask anyway.. VZW FiOS link in one building (primary) and VZW FIOS link in a second building (secondary). the gateway for the primary link is sometimes unavailable.. squid is fine on both ends.. 0.30

[squid-users] possible OT: squidGuard, LDAP and FreeBSD ports..

Does anyone know if this combination works? It seems the FreeBSD port (with ldap enabled) does not actually build an ldap enabled squidguard.. Clues appreciated.

Re: [squid-users] Optimized Squids

Optimization tip #3: use fastest disk IO method available. Fedora being a linux that would be AUFS. see tip #3. AUFS makes use of multi-core threads, diskd process is single-threaded even if it runs additional to the Squid main thread. What would it be for FreeBSD?

[squid-users] connection refused by proxy.. where to start..

Running a squid box for a large network, about 3k computers; but only about 1/3 are ever on at one time.. Squid Object Cache: Version 2.7.STABLE7 Start Time: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:49:52 GMT Current Time: Tue, 04 May 2010 13:16:48 GMT Connection information for squid: Number of

[squid-users] seemingly stupid question about cache_dir and TCP_HIT

Trying to setup a small local proxy for testing.. 2.7 Stable7 on FreeBSD 32bit here are the mem and cache entries from squid.conf.. # memory options memory_pools off cache_mem 1024 MB maximum_object_size_in_memory 2 MB ## cache options cache deny all cache_dir null /tmp cache_access_log

Re: [squid-users] Mid-size Schools that use Squid

On 2/4/09 4:40 PM, Mickey Walker wrote: I am interested in talking with Tech Support individuals that have implemented Squid in mid-sized school districts. I would like to know what kinds of problems they had with the implementation and the performance improvements they received. I am trying

[squid-users] FreeBSD 7/zfs recommendations

Hello all, Playing w/ zfs on an i386 and amd64 machines. Wondering if anyone has any recommendations they would make for FreeBSD 7 and squid 2.4 (or would 3 be better?) Looking for aufs vs diskd vs coss. diskd seems faster on a GENERIC kernel, but after the recommended kernel entries are

[squid-users] FreeBSD rrd performance graphs?

I am looking for something that will graph the effectiveness of my squid proxies, something like mailgraph for squid. Anyone have any suggestions?

[squid-users] trying to use cache_peer (I think?)

Hello All, I'm sure this will work if I can get it to.. (until I run into the next snag). Here at the school we get free Road Runner cable access (about 2mb down). What I wanted to do is put an ipcop machine with something called updatexlrator. basically it caches the windows updates

[squid-users] newbie squidclient mgr:info questions

Hello All, I found this the other day and have been trying to find out as much as I can.. and still a little confused.. HTTP/1.0 200 OK Server: squid/2.6.STABLE19 Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:05:15 GMT Content-Type: text/plain Expires: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:05:15 GMT Last-Modified: Mon, 07 Apr

[squid-users] newbie syslog.conf and coss questions

Morning all, I am running squid 2.6.stable18 from FreeBSD ports. (FreeBSD 6.x and 7.x) I have two questions.. 1) regarding coss. I have enabled coss as shown in the squid faq and all seems to be working wonderfully. I had some questions about the cache_swap_log so I was reading

[squid-users] FreeBSD 7.0, coss and squid version?

Hello all, I recently decided to try to put coss into my squid.conf and found it worked much faster with little effort. However I found that 3.0.2 has an 'authentication' bug, and it seems that 3.0.2 with coss has it's own set of 'questionable' events. Would squid with squidguard and

[squid-users] 3.0.2 ncsa_auth broken?

Hello all, Still looking at it but it looks like 3.0.1 had no problem with this. I have squid 3.0.2 with squidguard from FreeBSD ports running on 7.0 and 6.2 and 6.3 and it acted the same way on all of them, went back to 3.0.1 and problem went away. After I upgraded to 3.0.2 and restarted