RE: [squid-users] any work arounds for bug 2176

2009-12-22 Thread Bill Allison
?) to make that happen (bearing in mind I'm an absolute novice C coder)? Bill A. -Original Message- From: vincent.blon...@ing.be [mailto:vincent.blon...@ing.be] Sent: 22 December 2009 07:36 To: squid-users@squid-cache.org; squ...@treenet.co.nz Cc: Bill Allison; vincent.blon...@ing.be S

RE: [squid-users] any work arounds for bug 2176

2009-12-18 Thread Bill Allison
Reposted for info to the list, without the attachments that cause the list to bounce the message -Original Message- From: Bill Allison Sent: 18 December 2009 09:43 To: 'Amos Jeffries'; Brett Lymn Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: RE: [squid-users] any work arounds fo

RE: [squid-users] any work arounds for bug 2176

2009-12-16 Thread Bill Allison
and would appreciate suggestions as to which debug_options would include all possibly relevant info -Original Message----- From: Bill Allison [mailto:bill.alli...@bsw.co.uk] Sent: 16 December 2009 12:07 To: Amos Jeffries; squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: RE: [squid-users] any work arounds for bug

RE: [squid-users] any work arounds for bug 2176

2009-12-16 Thread Bill Allison
ect: Re: [squid-users] any work arounds for bug 2176 Bill Allison wrote: > Amos > > I've done some more testing / tracing with this - one finding and one > question to help me do more. > > My finding is that the response to a large POST varies - put simply, a small > (

RE: [squid-users] any work arounds for bug 2176

2009-12-16 Thread Bill Allison
dy guessed :-) ) but really need to find a fix or workaround, despite knowing that Microsoft state that IIS NTLM authentication can not work through proxy servers. Any pointers gratefully received. Kind regards Bill A. -----Original Message- From: Bill Allison Sent: 10 December 2009 12:5

RE: [squid-users] any work arounds for bug 2176

2009-12-07 Thread Bill Allison
As the reporter of this bug, apologies Amos for not responding promptly and thanks Brett for doing so - my excuse is pressure of work. It's particularly on my conscience because we so badly need this fix. Today I have a test instance I can use, and I guess the next step, and my contribution, is

[squid-users] RE: SQUID PAC-File and JAVA (1.6.11) SOLVED?

2009-08-18 Thread Bill Allison
Long post - hope some of it makes sense / helps. By coincidence, I also have just spent the last week trying to sort out a proxy.pac file that works for all of our situations - Windows road-warriors that have to use our Squids from any of our LANs, from VPN and direct from the Internet to our HQ

RE: [squid-users] JAVA Applet notinited

2008-08-25 Thread bill . allison
Hello This *might* be the same problem as I encountered recently, that in our case (squid-2.6.STABLE17, no authentication) caused very slow loading of applets. Here is the record from our task log that shows what we did to fix it. Hope it helps. "The delay was observed in Wireshark traces to

RE: [squid-users] POST + NTLM Authentica

2008-07-10 Thread bill . allison
fore I can upgrade, but I will let you know when done. What should I consider when deciding whether to go 3.0 or 2.7? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 July 2008 12:44 To: Bill Allison Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: Re: [

RE: [squid-users] POST + NTLM Authentica

2008-07-10 Thread bill . allison
Thanks. Pressure of work means that it will be a few days before I can upgrade, but I will let you know when done. What should I consider when deciding whether to go 3.0 or 2.7? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 July 2008 12:44 To: Bill Allison Cc: [EMAIL

RE: [squid-users] POST + NTLM Authentica

2008-07-10 Thread bill . allison
Hi I think this may be the same as I reported as bug 2176 (http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2176) against 2.6 STABLE17. Is it known to be fixed in 2.7 or 3.0?. Apologies for asking - I haven't had time yet to go through changes logs for subsequent versions. Bill A. --