book while keep using transparent tproxy.
with to help
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/why-squid-can-block-https-when-i-point-my-browser-to-port-and-cant-when-its-transparent-tp4667069.html
Sent from the Squid - Users ma
shared
workers , but squid couldnt start !!
can u correct me plz ?
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Worker-I-O-push-queue-overflow-ipcIo7-30506r9-tp4664857p4664977.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
list assist me with it ?
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Question-in-adding-banner-for-ads-by-squid-tp4664976.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
will be better
:)
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/static-caching-for-specific-website-for-specific-time-tp4664943.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote
> On 19/02/2014 12:12 a.m., Dr.x wrote:
>> im doubting ,
>> without smp with same traffic and same users i can save 40Mbps
>>
>> but in smp with combination of aufs with rock (32KB max obj size)
>> i can only save 20Mbps
>>
>>
?
bw saving is a big issue to me and must be done !!!
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/What-are-recommended-settings-for-optimal-sharing-of-cache-between-SMP-workers-tp4664909p4664915.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list
: ipcIo7.30506r9
*
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Worker-I-O-push-queue-overflow-ipcIo7-30506r9-tp4664857.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
@Rajiv Desai
have u found increasing in bandwidth saving when u used large rock ??
if so
how much difference u found ?
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Performance-tuning-of-SMP-Large-rock-tp4664765p4664851.html
Sent from
options ? or install more
dependencies ?
im very enthusuated to test large rock ASAP
regrds
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/deep-understanding-of-squid-smp-with-disker-and-worker-tp4664780p4664850.html
Sent from the Squid - Users
is cahce manager ?
NOTE THAT IN AUFS workers i put max object size = 10M
i mean i was supposed to see something higher than 37.85kB ?
can u explain that ?
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Unbalaned-Cpu-cores-with-squid
n updating squid and fixing
bugs
but i thuink this issue need a priority in work with squid developers
agian , gret thankfull for you (Alex) and for squid team developers
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Unbalaned-Cpu-cores-wi
1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17,19,21 ??
???
also at the orther side , if i have 3 aufs hardisk and need to map each
aufs process to worker
dos mapping aufs hardsisk workers can make differs ??
what is the best method to use or ehat i have to avoid ?
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context
Alex Rousskov wrote
> On 02/13/2014 12:45 PM, Dr.x wrote:
>> now the limitation of 32kB is on disk objects only ??
>> or
>> both (memory or disk )
>
>
> Shared memory cache prior to Large Rock support has the 32KB limit.
> Shared memory cache after Large Rock
hi alex ,
good ,
now the limitation of 32kB is on disk objects only ??
or
both (memory or disk )
?
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/deep-understanding-of-squid-smp-with-disker-and-worker-tp4664780p4664783.html
Sent from the
now is my answer correct ??
i have more questions
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/deep-understanding-of-squid-smp-with-disker-and-worker-tp4664780.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in this case we still have 32 k object size max in ram ??
what is the best implementation for smp with rock with aufs so that we have
max bw utilization and max hit ratio ?
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/question-about
eplacement_policy heap LFUDA
> #
> dns_nameservers x.x.x.x 8.8.8.8
> ###
> http_access deny all
> ##
> refresh_pattern ^ftp: 144020% 100
1 kid1| abandoning local=10.10.0.50:80 remote=x.x.x.x
FD 163 flags=17
===
wish to clarify if it is harmfull log
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/SECURITY
=1
2013/12/19 10:35:52 kid2| Accepting TPROXY spoofing HTTP Socket connections
at local=x:xx remote=[::] FD 17 flags=17
2013/12/19 10:35:53 kid2| storeLateRelease: released 0 objects
how troubleshoot this issue ??
wish to help
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http:/
rock /CACHE1 2 max-size=32768 swap-timeout=350
#
Slow after sometime tshooting
memory_pools off
pconn_timeout 2 minutes
persistent_request_timeout 1 minute
#
read_ahead_gap 128 KB
Eliezer Croitoru-2 wrote
> Hey dr,
>
> On 11/12/13 10:24, Dr.x wrote:
>>
>> and again , here , im asking Amos about SMP>>>>>
>>
>> can we after using SMP to get more BW saving ?? assume we fixed all other
>> parameters of squid and want
try to increase cache mem values :
try
# MEMORY CACHE OPTIONS
cache_mem 4096 MB
maximum_object_size_in_memory 2 MB
then test performance
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache
of squid and want to make comparision .
assume i have server without smp and save about 40 MBps
can i reach this value after SMP ???
with my best regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/how-to-use-multi-instances-SMP-in-squid
ng parameters and enhance squid .
again ,
my understanding is not soo good, but as i can i tried to help u ,
mr Amos has alot of answers to next questions .
wish i helped u
regards
Ahmd
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/how-to-use
hi ,
does rock memory needs as same as aufs rule ?
does 14 M for 64 bits needed for 1G storage of type rock ???
or more ??
i had some hang in squid after about 7 days of working fine , and not sure
of the grow of my rock hardsisk is the reason or not .
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this
e Disk files open: 2
Internal Data Structures:
2194 StoreEntries
1029 StoreEntries with MemObjects
32000 Hot Object Cache Items
651168 on-disk objects
but i noted that there is co
commit=100 0 2
=
the folder /CACHE2 is on the same with disk operating system .
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/SMP-Rock-frequent-FATAL-Received-Segment-Violation-dying-only-on-kid3-tp4663349p4663356.html
Sent
again
and so on .
dont know shoulld i remove logrotate directive , or may the rock db
damaged and cause this dying signal ???!!!
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/SMP-Rock-frequent-FATAL-Received-Segment-Violation-dying-on
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote
> On 2013-11-18 07:22, Dr.x wrote:
>> Helmut Hullen wrote
>>> Hallo, Dr.x,
>>>
>>> Du meintest am 17.11.13:
>>>
>>>> ive configured squid to be logrotated from script in
>>>> /etc/logrotate.d/squid but
Helmut Hullen wrote
> Hallo, Dr.x,
>
> Du meintest am 17.11.13:
>
>> ive configured squid to be logrotated from script in
>> /etc/logrotate.d/squid but ,
>> logrotating is not working fine !
>
> Sorry - "logrotate" works fine, but it works in anot
Eliezer Croitoru-2 wrote
> Hey,
>
> What is the content of the file "/etc/logrotate.d/squid"
>
> Eliezer
>
> On 17/11/13 17:09, Dr.x wrote:
>> hi all ,
>> ive configured squid to be logrotated from script in
>> /etc/logrotate.d/sq
17 10:04 cache.log.5
[root@squid logrotate.d]#
!
why files still there
*not sure if this has a relation when we work with smp with squid !!*
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/logrotate-with-SMP-problem-tp466.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Alex Rousskov wrote
> On 11/13/2013 02:04 AM, Dr.x wrote:
>> hi ,
>> when i restart squid
>> ihave
>> Store rebuilding is 0.94% complete
>>
>> note that although im getting small storage to squid (10 G) it takes alot
>> of
>> time to rebuild
question is :
can i let squid do rebuild it faster ???
should i stop wccp redirection to squid from router untill rebuild is
completed ?? or it is just normal issue to let squid start and redirect
users and the rebuilt hasnt finished yet?
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context
{Accept: */*
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
2013/11/12 00:53:21| WARNING: HTTP header contains NULL characters {Accept:
*/*
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded}
NULL
=
but , im happy that i dont see them in squid 3.3.9
-
Dr.x
--
View
b file and converted it to oidb file and put it in m y
>> mrtg
>> .
>>
>> by here im using smp , not sure from the results
>>
>>
>> i also revived some suspicious logs :
>>
>> 2013/11/08 16:51:26 kid3| snmpHandleUdp: FD 20 recvfrom: (11) Resource
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote
> * Amos Jeffries <
> squid3@.co
> >:
>> On 12/11/2013 9:08 p.m., Dr.x wrote:
>> > hi ,
>> > is that harmfull log ??
>> >
>> > 2013/11
3/11/08 16:51:51 kid3| snmpHandleUdp: FD 19 recvfrom: (11) Resource
temporarily unavailable
2013/11/08 16:51:51 kid1| snmpHandleUdp: FD 20 recvfrom: (11) Resource
temporarily unavailable
not sure if it is harmful !!!
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-p
1ef7ec7e718012&channel_ids=,&fpr=c874c715b2faad8885ad1254850d8d74&loc=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.mobilism.org%2Fviewtopic.php%3Ff%3D1292%26t%3D652520&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.mobilism.org%2Fviewtopic.php%3Ff%3D1292%26t%3D652520&cb=08604172'
2013/11/11 02:20:13 kid2| WARNING: unparseable HTTP header field {:: }
===
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/WARNING-unparseable-HTTP-header-field-tp4663232.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
nting options related to rock ,
is it critical for performance ??
' i read wiki , but no one care with it !!!
as an example machine with 7 hardisks ssd , each hardisk with 90 G storage ,
and with about 4000 req/sec on squid with smp.
does squid 3.3.10 better than squid 3.3.9 for rock su
ed
saving ( i know its not accurate)
my question is does my calcultion bw saving speed containg a very error
value ?
assume i have 700Mbps pumped to squid.
===
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/is-there-any-thing-wrong-from-cache-manager-logs-tp4663156p4663214.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
good job
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-3-10-is-available-tp4663209p4663210.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote
> On 2013-11-08 12:29, Dr.x wrote:
>> Amos Jeffries-2 wrote
>>> On 2013-11-08 11:26, Dr.x wrote:
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Select loops:
>>>>> * 1K/sec under the fast traffic period
>>>
mem requests
in sysctl , was edited by =>net.ipv4.tcp_mem = 6085248 8113664 12170496
i know it is very huge relative to small number of users , but i thibnk i
will use it when i migrate my work to bigger machine
in summary , and so that we dont make more conflict for readers this pos
Alex Rousskov wrote
> On 11/05/2013 01:49 AM, Dr.x wrote:
>
>> Im trying to use smp on 4 cores of server of 8 g ram
>> 4 workers and no disk caching
>> Only depending on hot mem caching
>>
>> Don’t know why there is log if cache.log about "vary o
Eliezer Croitoru-2 wrote
> OK so the next step since I didn't noticed couple things(IPV6 bindings)
>
> On 11/08/2013 01:21 AM, Dr.x wrote:
>> anyway , ive made another test
>> before the degredation , 1st 5 minutes of squid
>> [root@squid ~]# cat /tmp/tmp_lsof
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote
> On 2013-11-08 11:26, Dr.x wrote:
>> .
>>
>>
>>> Select loops:
>>> * 1K/sec under the fast traffic period
>>> * relaying 3.5MB/sec
>>>
>>> * 7K/sec and 9K/sec in the periods you indicate as slow
>>
f.1 |grep ESTABLISHED |wc -l
3262
[root@squid ~]# cat /tmp/tmp_lsof.1 |grep TIME_WAIT |wc -l
0
[root@squid ~]# cat /tmp/tmp_lsof.1 |grep CLOSE_WAIT |wc -l
5
[root@squid ~]# cat /tmp/tmp_lsof.1 |grep LISTEN |wc -l
8
[root@squid ~]# cat /tmp/tmp_lsof.1 |grep ":53" |wc -l
57
[root@squid ~]# c
ng understood ,
if u look at graph
u will note that "out" traffic is samller than "in" traffic
not understanding why
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/is-there-any-thing-wrong-from-cache-manager-logs-tp
(-r) 0
stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192
cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited
max user processes (-u) 63772
virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited
file locks (-x) unlimited
[root@squid ~]# ulimit -n
131072
[root@squid ~]#
d this be the problem ???
i did my best to let squid far from memory problems .
=
currently i stopped squid and want to fix the issue before using the other
servers and pump more users
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.c
not bade before
running squid .
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/is-there-any-thing-wrong-from-cache-manager-logs-tp4663156p4663166.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hi ,
after removing the acl, i have the same scenario
squid start excellent , but after sometime
the traffic get decreasing and interrupt in youtube and slow browsing !!!
that is my issue
after removing the acl , i had the same issue ,slow after sometime
-
Dr.x
--
View this
300
Store Disk files open: 0
Internal Data Structures:
748 StoreEntries
748 StoreEntries with MemObjects
12137 Hot Object Cache Items
0 on-disk objects
==
regards
-----
Dr.x
--
View this mess
Eliezer Croitoru-2 wrote
> Hey Dr,
>
> On 11/06/2013 12:34 PM, Dr.x wrote:
>> hi ,
>>
>> with squid 3.3.9 & smp ,
>>
>> i m using long acl and it is shared amon all workers of squid
>>
>> but i find in logs that some kids have timeout reg
lied to every one accessing squid !!
i think this issue similar to (wccp_rebuild off) when using rock with wccp
!
any solutions ?
regards
-----
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/squid-regestiartion-time-out-when-loading-long-acl
e-storeio=ufs,aufs,diskd,rock' '--enable-removal-policies=lru,heap'
'--enable-delay-pools' '--enable-cache-digests' '--enable-underscores'
'--enable-icap-client' '--enable-follow-x-forwarded-for' '--enable-auth'
'--enable-basic-auth-helpers=LDAP,MSNT,NCSA,PAM,SASL,SMB,YP,DB,POP3,getpwnam,squid_radius_auth,multi-domain-NTLM'
'--enable-ntlm-auth-helpers=smb_lm'
'--enable-digest-auth-helpers=ldap,password'
'--enable-negotiate-auth-helpers=squid_kerb_auth'
'--enable-external-acl-helpers=ip_user,ldap_group,session,unix_group,wbinfo_group'
'--enable-arp-acl' '--enable-esi' '--disable-translation'
'--with-logdir=/var/log/squid' '--with-pidfile=/var/run/squid.pid'
'--with-filedescriptors=131072' '--with-large-files'
'--with-default-user=squid' '--enable-linux-netfilter'
'build_alias=i486-linux-gnu' 'CFLAGS=-g -O2 -g -Wall -O2' 'LDFLAGS='
'CPPFLAGS=' 'CXXFLAGS=-g -O2 -g -Wall -O2' --enable-ltdl-convenience
==
with config above,
ive pumped only 500 users and i have slow browsing and youtube
interrupting ,
i tested without squid , i found that performnace is better and no youtube
interrupt
with to know wts wrong , andf wish to fix this issue and start pumping more
users to squid
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/alot-of-vary-object-loop-logs-in-squid-3-3-9-and-slow-performance-tp4663137.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
chine and see the performance .
i will tell you about result ,
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/load-tpoxy-wccp-on-multiple-interfaces-by-smp-tp4663100p4663123.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Eliezer Croitoru-2 wrote
> On 11/03/2013 02:25 PM, Dr.x wrote:
>> Feature
>> *
>> PowerEdge R720 technical specification
>> Form factor 2U rack
>> Processors Intel ® Xeon ® processor E5-2600 product family
>
Eliezer Croitoru-2 wrote
> On 11/03/2013 12:41 PM, Dr.x wrote:
>> hi amos ,
>>
>> wts the maximum req/sec squid with smp of 24 cores cpu can handle in my
>> case
>> ?
> Just wondering to myself, what is the CPU of the machine?
> it's not about maximum
hi amos ,
wts the maximum req/sec squid with smp of 24 cores cpu can handle in my case
?
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/load-tpoxy-wccp-on-multiple-interfaces-by-smp-tp4663100p4663112.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote
> On 3/11/2013 5:22 p.m., Dr.x wrote:
>> hi ,
>>
>> its just an updating idea ,
>> we have 6000 users and we have 96 G ram and 24 CPU cores and DELR720
>> hardware ,
>> actually i want to use smp and want to handle them by squid
>>
hi amos ,
so ,
in summary ,
i can say that it is normal issue
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/frequent-TCP-MISS-ABORTED-is-it-harmfull-tp4663051p4663104.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at
t;
i mean it may be in squid 3.3.9 some new logs added ??
plz clarify
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/frequent-TCP-MISS-ABORTED-is-it-harmfull-tp4663051p4663101.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
t;"",
so i need to use 2 interfaces so that make network load distribution
can squid smp handle what i want ????
without bugs ?
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/load-tpoxy-wccp-on-multiple-interfaces-by-smp-tp4663100
ave full load core distribution ?
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/WARNING-Could-not-determine-this-machines-public-hostname-Please-configure-one-or-set-visible-hostna-tp4663074p4663099.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
dont see this error but i have
slownesss in squid !!!
can you explain why ?
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Vary-object-loop-tp4662627p4663097.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Alex Rousskov wrote
> On 11/01/2013 02:39 PM, Dr.x wrote:
>
>> in smp , im trying to let the acl load on a specific process , i mean
>> that
>> the acl verification watse alot of cpu ,
>
> ACL verification _wastes_ CPU only if you do not need those ACLs to be
&
Alex Rousskov wrote
> On 11/01/2013 01:26 PM, Dr.x wrote:
>
>> from cache manager we have top ten sites ,
>>
>> my question is how to let squid optimize those sites ??
>>
>> as an example , i mean how to let squid use cache mem for cahcing them
>>
e_hostname'.
2013/11/01 16:37:29| WARNING: 'squid' rDNS test failed: (0) No error.
2013/11/01 16:37:29| WARNING: Could not determine this machines public
hostname. Please configure one or set 'visible_hostname'.
why ?!!
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
htt
there some refresh patterns i put it for the specific sites (the Top ten
sites visited ) ???
any advices ?
wish to clarify
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/how-enhance-browsing-quality-for-top-ten-sites-on-my-squid-tp46
and no tcp_aborted !
let me test connecting squid directly with router and & will give u results
regards
-----
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/frequent-TCP-MISS-ABORTED-is-it-harmfull-tp4663051p4663072.html
Sent from the Squid - U
oot ??
is there a probability in squid config file ??
or it just relative to networking issues ??
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/frequent-TCP-MISS-ABORTED-is-it-harmfull-tp4663051p4663068.html
Sent from the Squid - Users ma
TCP_MISS_ABORTED/000 0 GET
http://imgcdn.ptvcdn.net/pan_img/appDownload/PandoraService/Service_Info.xml
===
does this mean that there is a degredation ?
or natural log ?
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4
HI ,
Sokvantha wrote
did u find a solution for your problem ??
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/wccp2-does-not-working-tp4659056p4663050.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hi , we dont see any attachments
plz post squid.conf and cache.log file
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/SQUID-ERROR-tp4663015p4663016.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
put the two directives above, the client still
visit the ip resulted from its dns resolving !
with to clarify
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/SQUID-in-TPROXY-do-not-resolve-tp4662819p4663024.html
Sent from the Squid - Users
i have kid
registeration time out !!
im guessing the problem!!
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-3-2-SMP-Problem-tp4658906p4663020.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hi amos ,
is there a method that let squid force its dns reply and ignore the client
dns reply ???
=
i mean if client x got 1.1.1.1
and squid got 2.2.2.2
i want client to go to 2.2.2.2 not to 1.1.1.1
=
regards
-
Dr.x
g but otherwise identical settings. In theory that
> would make the frontend able to HIT on the rock cache, but only the
> backends able to store things there.
>
> Amos
not understanding yet ,
why add to front end a cahe dir ???
did u mean to put cache dir into process squid # 1??
hi ,
not all the Multi layer switches has full wccp capability
tproxy is needed above , so we need to define services ,
but 3550 MLS dont support it
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-1-with-Tproxy-and-WCCP-on
o ,
seems your MLS dont support wccp services ,
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3550/software/release/12.1_19_ea1/configuration/guide/swwccp.html
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-1
hi alex ,
im happy to hear that from you
nice update on wiki .
regards
-
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/something-not-being-understood-in-workers-squid-proces-cores-mapping-tp4662942p4662990.html
Sent from the Squid - Users
CPU get high , tell me, i may find a better solution for u
regards
-----
Dr.x
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-1-with-Tproxy-and-WCCP-on-Cisco-3550-tp4662987p4662989.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
84 matches
Mail list logo
