在 2009-07-14二的 00:41 -0700，Elli Albek写道：
> Hi,
> We have squid as reverse proxy that caches files. There are two types of
> cacheable files. I see in the log that one type always gets TCP_HIT:NONE
> (response from disk cache) and the other type always gets TCP_MEM_HIT:NONE
> (response from memory c
在 2009-08-06四的 05:48 -0700，aba3k写道：
> Amazon.com is not loading correctly for me, the layout is wrong and the
> images are not loaded. Without the cache all load ok. How can i correct this
> without rebuilding the entire cache?
Maybe I got the same problem when cache http://www.youku.com/ which is
在 2010-01-05二的 16:54 +0100，Angelo Höngens写道：
> On 5-1-2010 16:49, Roland Roland wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > i'm looking to do the following hope someone could help me if its
> > actually feasible..
> > each day at 8 AM, i want access.log to be renamed to
> > access.log.DateOfPreviousDay
> > that w
在 2010-01-12二的 16:19 -0300，Guido Marino Lorenzutti写道：
> Ops.. that's too much.
> I have severeal squids, and I must keep the log from one month and
> it's a lot of space. I was thinking about something like btrfs to
> store them.
I'm doing same thing. I use a standalone syslog server which runs
在 2010-01-26二的 10:30 -0900，Chris Robertson写道：
> Landy Landy wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Won't do no good. Landy's Squid compile time option is
> >> 16384 max. So
> >> either she stumbled over a bug or the Squid is under a
> >> higher load with
> >> lots of connections.
> >> Landy, are you graphing Squ
I'm using a squid cluster with CARP configured, they works great.
I'm not sure if all the CARP frontend distributed URLs based on the
_same_ hash value,
here's result queried by squidclient:
16:00:25 ~ $ for i in 66 67 68 71; do ask_squid $i carp | grep -A7
Hostname; done
Hostname
2010/4/14 Amos Jeffries :
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:10:38 +0800, Drunkard Zhang
> wrote:
>> I'm using a squid cluster with CARP configured, they works great.
>>
>> I'm not sure if all the CARP frontend distributed URLs based on the
>> _same_ hash value,
2010/4/20 Alexandr Dmitriev :
> Hello,
>
> I have ubuntu 9.10 runing with squid 3.0.STABLE18-1 and squidGuard.
>
> Squid is set up as a transparent proxy - everything is working just fine,
> except I can't access one site (www.airbaltic.lv). Squid drops me an error -
> Access denied.
Try this:
ech
2010/7/28 Marcello Romani :
> Tóth Tibor Péter ha scritto:
>>
>> It was just a curiosity.
>> I am interested what other people use in their cache server as far as ram
>> goes. :)
>> That's all.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Marcello Romani [mailto:mrom...@ottotecnica.com] Sent: Wednesda
2010/8/9 Stand H :
> Hi all,
>
> If configured properly, how much traffic can a server with 16GB RAM, 3.0Ghz
> CPU, and 5 x 500GB SAS drive can handle? Anyone has a squid box that can
> handle more than 300Mbps traffic?
>
> From my experience and configuration, it can handle around 80Mbps only. T
2010/8/9 Stand H :
>
>> > If configured properly, how much traffic can a server
>> with 16GB RAM, 3.0Ghz CPU, and 5 x 500GB SAS drive can
>> handle? Anyone has a squid box that can handle more than
>> 300Mbps traffic?
>> >
>> > From my experience and configuration, it can handle
>> around 80Mbps o
: [squid-users] how much traffic can squid handle?
>>> To: "Drunkard Zhang"
>>> Cc: "Stand H" , squid-users@squid-cache.org
>>> Date: Monday, August 9, 2010, 6:26 PM
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Drunkard Zhang
&g
2010/8/11 Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa :
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
>> 2010/8/11 Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa :
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Stand H wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>
2010/8/12 Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
>> > With same multi-squid-instance configuration, same Linux distro, and
>> > different hardware, AMD Opteron gets more balanced CPU usage, while on
>> > Intel Xeon just
In order to get squid server 400M+ traffic, I did these:
1. Memory only
IO bottleneck is too hard to avoid at high traffic, so I did not use
harddisk, use only memory for HTTP cache. 32GB or 64GB memory per box
works good.
2. Disable useless acl
I did not use any acl, even default acls:
acl SSL_po
In order to get squid server 400M+ traffic, I did these:
1. Memory only
IO bottleneck is too hard to avoid at high traffic, so I did not use
harddisk, use only memory for HTTP cache. 32GB or 64GB memory per box
works good.
2. Disable useless acl
I did not use any acl, even default acls:
acl SSL_po
My configuration:
cache_dir coss /mnt/c/72 10240 max-size=524288 max-stripe-waste=32768
block-size=4096 maxfullbufs=10
cache_swap_log /mnt/s/%s
/mnt/c/72 is a file on btrfs + SSD. The btrfs is created by:
"mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1", so it will spanning across two SSDs.
But squid did not wr
2011/1/7 Amos Jeffries :
> On 07/01/11 19:08, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
>>
>> In order to get squid server 400M+ traffic, I did these:
>> 1. Memory only
>> IO bottleneck is too hard to avoid at high traffic, so I did not use
>> harddisk, use only memory for HTTP c
2011/1/8 Mohsen Saeedi :
> and now which filesystem has better performance. aufs or diskd? on the
> SAS hdd for example.
Neither of them, we are using coss on SATA. And coss on SSD is under
testing, looks good still.
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
>>
&
Of cource, we tested every squid-3.x, many bugs and poor performance
to squid-2.x. We tested squid-2.HEAD too, it's worth to try.
aufs acts very bad under high presure, with 8GB memory and least SATA
aufs space per instance, it's still too hard to over 180Mbps.
I haven't try diskd yet
2011/1/8 Amos Jeffries :
> On 08/01/11 06:22, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
>>
>> 2011/1/8 Mohsen Saeedi:
>>>
>>> I know about coss. it's great. but i have squid 3.1 and i think it's
>>> unstable in 3.x version. that's correct?
>>
>>
I'm testing squid-2.7STABLE9 + COSS + ext4 + SSD now.
When enlarge the coss, eg: from 10240 to 20480, I can see success in
cache.log, but the coss file on disk did not change, after 3 times of
"squid -k reconfigure" the coss file size changed.
But some times later, the squid process exited, with n
2011/1/12 Amos Jeffries :
> On 12/01/11 20:12, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
>>
>> I'm testing squid-2.7STABLE9 + COSS + ext4 + SSD now.
>>
>> When enlarge the coss, eg: from 10240 to 20480, I can see success in
>> cache.log, but the coss file on disk did not
> Median Service Times (seconds) 5 min 60 min:
> HTTP Requests (All): 0.00865 0.00865
> Cache Misses: 0.01035 0.01035
> Cache Hits: 0.0 0.0
> Near Hits: 0.00091 0.00091
> Not-Modified Replies: 0.0 0.0
>
2011/8/18 Chen Bangzhong :
> My cached objects will expire after 10 minutes.
>
> Cache-Control:max-age=600
Static content like pictures should cache longer, like 1 day, 86400.
> I don't know why there are so many disk writes and there are so many
> objects on disk.
>
> In addtion, Disk hits as %
2011/8/18 Amos Jeffries :
> On 18/08/11 19:40, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
>>
>> 2011/8/18 Chen Bangzhong:
>>>
>>> My cached objects will expire after 10 minutes.
>>>
>>> Cache-Control:max-age=600
>>
>> Static content like pictures should
2011/9/20 nikko...@gmail.com :
> Hello,
> I would like to implement a proxy server in load balancing with 2 or
> more server proxy.
> It is possible to do this?
> What can I use? LVS? Ultramonkey? Other?
>
keepalived uses LVS, very simple but strong implementation, PLUS CARP
which give you more pow
2012/8/3 Hugo Deprez :
> Dear community,
>
> I am running squid3 on Linux Debian squeeze.(3.1.6).
>
> I encounter a suddenly a high memory usage on my virtual machine don't
> really know why.
> Looking at the cacti memory graph is showing a memory jump from 1.5 Gb
> to 4GB and then ther server star
2012/8/12 Amos Jeffries :
> On 11/08/2012 10:21 p.m., Jack Bates wrote:
>>
>> On 11/08/12 12:30 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/08/2012 7:22 p.m., Jack Bates wrote:
I am interested in intercepting content as it is written to the cache,
and computing a digest from the content.
29 matches
Mail list logo
