Re: [squid-users] Allow a client to only one https site and path

ió: > De: Amos Jeffries > Asunto: Re: [squid-users] Allow a client to only one https site and path > Para: squid-users@squid-cache.org > Fecha: Martes 19 de Marzo de 2013 7:30 > On 20/03/2013 12:36 a.m., Jannis > Kafkoulas wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm using squid

[squid-users] Allow a client to only one https site and path

Hi, I'm using squid 2.7 on RHEL 5.6 and I have following issue: I want to restrict a client to accessing a specific https site and herein only a specific root path (and sub directories). So I tried this: acl restr_client src 10.1.1.100/32 acl restr_dom dstdomain www.example.com acl xyz urlpath_

Re: [squid-users] How to trick splay trees?

t; On 31/07/2012 9:48 p.m., Jannis > Kafkoulas wrote: > > Thanks for the quick answer! > > > > Now I see that I didn't express myself precisely enough > :-( > > > > "to also go via  cache_peer par-alt." wasn't meant > as an alternative (eithe

Re: [squid-users] How to trick splay trees?

should be directed only to par-alt. ... thanks --- El Lun 30/7/12, Amos Jeffries escribió: > De: Amos Jeffries > Asunto: Re: [squid-users] How to trick splay trees? > Para: squid-users@squid-cache.org > Fecha: Lunes 30 de Julio de 2012 15:25 > On 31/07/2012 1:25 a.m., Jannis &

[squid-users] How to trick splay trees?

Hi, (I use squid 2.7. STABLE9 on RedHat EL 5.6) Following problem: I have following dstdomains defined going to par-std and par-alt cache_peers respectively: acl alt dstdomain .fa-intracomp.net acl std dstdomain .intracomp.com Now I'd like "abc.intracomp.com" to also go via cache_peer par

RE: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs?

Eliezer Croitoru An: squid-users@squid-cache.org Gesendet: Samstag, den 30. April 2011, 12:39:56 Uhr Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs? On 30/04/2011 11:58, Jannis Kafkoulas wrote: > OK, I see! > > Thanks very much

AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs?

, Jannis Kafkoulas wrote: > Unfortunately I couldn't find any directives in squid.conf relating to any dns > matter. > But I have an idea why squid has to set up a nslookup: > > We use also ip addresses with acls for destinations. > So if squid receives an URL name it has to g

AW: AW: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs?

AW: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs? On 29/04/11 01:56, Jannis Kafkoulas wrote: > Of cource Eliezer, thanks a lot! > > > Yes, of course, I mean dns lookup by resolve. > > (It has been set up by an external company) > >

AW: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs?

s - Ursprüngliche Mail Von: Eliezer Croitoru An: squid-users@squid-cache.org Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 28. April 2011, 13:51:17 Uhr Betreff: Re: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs? On 28/04/2011 12:25, Jannis Kafkoulas wrote: > Hi

[squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs?

Hi, We have a proxy chain of 3 squids (v2.7, RHEL5). In my opinion only the last one needs really to resolve the URLs name in order to send the request directly to the web servers ip address in the Internet. Would it also work if the first two proxies wouldn't resolve? And how can that be prev