On 20.03.2012 03:54, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> So:
> - user configured browser to use a proxy
> - browser does not use proxy
>
> How is disobeying its own configuration details *not* a browser problem?
>
> Answer: when the problem is the user themselves misunderstanding the
> browser configuration
On 20.03.2012 07:31, Vishal Agarwal wrote:
> Hi Amos,
>
> You are right.
>
> Will this work with transferring all the traffic to http port from iptables ?
>
> Iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT
> --to-destination serverip:3128
>
> And further checki
On 19.03.2012 19:09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> it's impossible for the proxy to pass error page to the browser, when
> the user bypasses the proxy and connects to the website directly.
>
> You must deny direct access to HTTPS (port 443) sites by a firewall and
> force browsers to use the
On 19.03.2012 07:35, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Tried the current 3.1.19 release?
>
> Is the second HTTPS request even going through the proxy?
>
> What is the rest of the config look like?
> The partial piece of config you posted has no holes which this could be
> using.
>
> Amos
Hi,
Thank you for
Hi,
I have been using squid with basic authentication from quite some time
without problems while recently I discovered that anyone can open https
addresses trough the proxy without authenticating. If someone refuses
the authentication dialog (clicks on Cancel) and receives a squid access
denied e
Hi,
Recently I needed to use squid_db_auth against mysql database with md5
encrypted passwords.
I read a recent discussion on this list (Joomla DB authentication
support hits Squid!:)) that was regarding integration with joomla
database, but this wasn't working for me.
Here's a patch that makes
