Re: [squid-users] SmpScale + ERROR: No forward-proxy ports configured

2014-01-15 Thread Nathan Hoad
/SmpScale#Who_decides_which_worker_gets_the_request.3F Thanks, Nathan. -- Nathan Hoad Software Developer www.getoffmalawn.com On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Will Roberts wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working with an SmpScale configuration with 2 workers defined. Each > worker has its

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3 is very aggressive with memory

2014-01-14 Thread Nathan Hoad
> > > Hi Nathan, > > Do you think the following bug may be a factor? > > http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4005 > > Setting dynamic_cert_mem_cache_size to zero would be a good next triage > step, I guess. > > > HTH, > > Alex. > Confirmed! I've verified this in a lab setting, and di

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3 is very aggressive with memory

2014-01-09 Thread Nathan Hoad
e doing to progress this. I'm happy to add any debugging, just need to tell me where its should go. I'll keep trying to get Valgrind going in the mean time. Thanks, Nathan. -- Nathan Hoad Software Developer www.getoffmalawn.com On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Nathan Hoad wrote: > Apo

Re: [squid-users] Firefox update problems

2014-01-06 Thread Nathan Hoad
ents that don't do this, use the 'dst' acl type instead: acl sslbump_exclusions_ip dst 1.2.3.4 ssl_bump none sslbump_exclusions_ip Nathan. -- Nathan Hoad Software Developer www.getoffmalawn.com On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Roman Gelfand wrote: > I have an ssl bump set

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3 is very aggressive with memory

2014-01-04 Thread Nathan Hoad
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > Hey Nathan, > > I want to go back into the basic levels which we are talking about. > After reviewing the proxy configuration I am not sure why and how but: > Can you start running the proxy from scratch with basic squid.conf and go > one

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3 is very aggressive with memory

2014-01-04 Thread Nathan Hoad
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > OK so it seems like the basic issue is probably not in the level of FD or > something similar. > I do not know why the usage of ram is so high but the basic test I would do > is: > remove any cache_dir from squid > remove any memory cache

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3 is very aggressive with memory

2014-01-04 Thread Nathan Hoad
won't be able to run under valgrind. That was on a virtual machine though, so I will attempt running it on a proper hardware based machine to see if it helps at all - I will come back on Monday with more information. Thanks, Nathan. -- Nathan Hoad Software Developer www.getoffmalawn.com O

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3 is very aggressive with memory

2013-12-21 Thread Nathan Hoad
Interesting! Where abouts in the codebase is the code relating to the username cache? I'd like to take a look at this. Thanks, Nathan. On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 18/12/2013 6:54 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote: >> On 12/16/2013 10:24 PM, Nat

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3 is very aggressive with memory

2013-12-21 Thread Nathan Hoad
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote: > On 12/16/2013 10:24 PM, Nathan Hoad wrote: > >> While running under this configuration, I've confirmed that memory >> usage does go up when active, and stays at that level when inactive, >> allowing some time

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3 is very aggressive with memory

2013-12-21 Thread Nathan Hoad
tables -fpie' 'LIBS=-lpresenceclient -L/usr/local/lib' 'CXXFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i586 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fpie' 'PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/share/pkgc

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3 is very aggressive with memory

2013-12-16 Thread Nathan Hoad
#x27;s interest, I'll submit a patch for this issue. Many thanks, Nathan. -- Nathan Hoad Software Developer www.getoffmalawn.com On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Nathan Hoad wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Eliezer Croitoru > wrote: >> Hey Nathan, >> >>

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3 is very aggressive with memory

2013-12-14 Thread Nathan Hoad
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > Hey Nathan, > > I am looking for more details on the subject in hand in the shape of: > Networking Hardware Straight out of lspci: 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5722 Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express 03:01.0

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3 is very aggressive with memory

2013-12-14 Thread Nathan Hoad
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote: > On 12/12/2013 06:50 PM, Nathan Hoad wrote: > >> This leads me to believe that the objects that are consuming all of >> the memory are genuinely using that memory, and are freed on shutdown. > > This hypothesis is

[squid-users] Squid 3.3 is very aggressive with memory

2013-12-12 Thread Nathan Hoad
Hi folks, I'm in the process of coordinating a rollout of an update from 3.2 to 3.3, and I've been coming up against some memory issues. Squid 3.3.x seems to use considerably more memory than 3.2 with the same configuration. Looking at the logs I have, 3.3 is generally using more than double the

Re: [squid-users] Squid memory usage

2013-05-30 Thread Nathan Hoad
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote: > In a steady state, memory usage should not "increase over time through > general use". A steady state includes such preconditions as > > * no memory pools or sufficient traffic to fill memory pools > * no caching or sufficient traffic to fil

Re: [squid-users] Squid memory usage

2013-05-30 Thread Nathan Hoad
Fantastic explanation! Thanks heaps Amos. Would it make sense for this to go onto wiki.squid-cache.org somewhere? -- Nathan Hoad Software Developer www.getoffmalawn.com On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 29/05/2013 2:19 p.m., Nathan Hoad wrote: >> >> On Tu

Re: [squid-users] Squid memory usage

2013-05-28 Thread Nathan Hoad
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 28/05/2013 3:59 p.m., Nathan Hoad wrote: > > I take it you are referring to the 2.0g resident size? That is what I'm referring to, yes - the resident size has increased to 2.5g since my previous mail, virtual to 2.6g. >

[squid-users] Squid memory usage

2013-05-27 Thread Nathan Hoad
I'm running Squid 3.2.9, and I am seeing huge memory and CPU usage on busy sites. The CPU usage is expected due to the level of traffic, but the memory usage not so much. PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 15631 squid 25 0 2073m 2.0g 5464 R 87.4 20.3 230:11.

[squid-users] Known memory leaks in 3.2.7?

2013-03-06 Thread Nathan Hoad
Hi folks, Are there are any known memory leaks in Squid 3.2.7? I'm running a configuration involving ntlm auth, and I've noticed in particular that AVG smashes Squid when it can't authenticate - this has caused Squid to consume all the available memory and eventually crash. I've reproduced this

Re: [squid-users] cache_peer configuration is not being reliably hit in Squid 3.2.1

2012-09-25 Thread Nathan Hoad
So what should I do about this? Is it a configuration issue, or shall I report it as a bug? On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Nathan Hoad wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: >> >> >> The suspicious thing about this is that client aborts after on

Re: [squid-users] 3.2.1 : assertion failed

2012-09-20 Thread Nathan Hoad
I'm seeing this issue as well, also in a heavy load environment. I can provide ALL,9 level logs if necessary. On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Alexandre Chappaz wrote: > Hi, > > I am using squid 3.2.1 in a heavy load environnement. > Since upgrading from 3.1 to 3.2.1, we are having stability iss

Re: [squid-users] cache_peer configuration is not being reliably hit in Squid 3.2.1

2012-09-20 Thread Nathan Hoad
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > > The suspicious thing about this is that client aborts after only 83 > milliseconds. Barely enough time to get DNS data and start the TCP handshake > to upstream on a MISS. You can expect RTT to be between 50 and 150 > milliseconds to most

Re: [squid-users] cache_peer configuration is not being reliably hit in Squid 3.2.1

2012-09-19 Thread Nathan Hoad
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > From your use of client_dst_passthru I assume you have this Squid configured > as a transparent interception proxy? Yes, but it is also configured as a direct proxy. > > This is apache format for web end-servers. Do you have anything in S

[squid-users] cache_peer configuration is not being reliably hit in Squid 3.2.1

2012-09-19 Thread Nathan Hoad
Hello all, I'm running Squid 3.2.1, with a cache_peer configured to point at another local Squid instance as a parent proxy. The parent proxy is not getting reliably hit, for the *exact* same url. acl objectcache url_regex -i "/path/to/regexes" cache_peer localhost parent 60084 0 proxy-only name

[squid-users] 3.2.1: ntlmauthenticator reporting a lot of connections in "SHUTDOWN PENDING" state, and internet access lost.

2012-08-29 Thread Nathan Hoad
Hi folks, I'm running Squid 3.2.1 with NTLM auth configured as follows: auth_param ntlm program /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5- ntlmssp auth_param ntlm children 133 auth_param ntlm keep_alive off And I'm seeing an issue where internet access was not available until Squid was rest