Re: [squid-users] Segmentation fault on x86_64

2005-12-11 Thread Richard Lyons
>>> RAM. My CFLAGS are "-O3 -march=nocona -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer". It >>> didn't happen on 32 bit architecture. > gcc version 3.4.4 (Gentoo 3.4.4-r1, ssp-3.4.4-1.0, pie-8.7.8). Those > optimizations didn't cause problems earlier, I will try remove them if I > can't find anything in core dump

Re: [squid-users] infamous "zero-sized reply"

2005-04-15 Thread Richard Lyons
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Owen, Mary wrote: > I do have a pix firewall as do my other offices. I can access the site > through any of these(no proxy). When I remove my proxy(red hat 9 + > squid-2.5.STABLE1-2) from this office I can also access the web site. From > my proxy I can resolve it's address

RE: [squid-users] Zero Sized Reply [attn: long post]

2003-12-09 Thread Richard Lyons
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Trevor wrote: > I downloaded and installed the squid-2.5.STABLE3-20030613.3.i386.rpm, The package has an early fix for this bug: http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=699 The bugfix is incorporated into squid-2.5.STABLE4. Perhaps the FAQ answer should be up

Re: [squid-users] What is this error for?

2003-09-02 Thread Richard Lyons
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Liquid Crystal wrote: > Zero Sized Reply > Squid did not receive any data for this request. > > Any hints? http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-11.html#ss11.51 A patch was added to 2.5-STABLE3 around 11th July that fixed some instances of this error, if you have an older v

Re: [squid-users] Memory leak?

2003-09-01 Thread Richard Lyons
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Shpend Bakalli wrote: > (it continues to eat the mem and swaps), and it is not accounted in > squid process (which grows up to 500 MB). When squid is shut down Forgive me for asking the obvious question: are you basing this on the output of free? You're aware that the OS uses