On 3/23/2013 8:04 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 24/03/2013 12:52 a.m., Sokvantha Youk wrote:
On 3/23/2013 11:19 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 22/03/2013 11:05 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 22/03/2013 7:21 p.m., Sokvantha YOUK wrote:
Dear Amos,
I am pretty sure love to go down to try SMP
On 3/23/2013 11:19 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 22/03/2013 11:05 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 22/03/2013 7:21 p.m., Sokvantha YOUK wrote:
Dear Amos,
I am pretty sure love to go down to try SMP equivalent of a CARP
peering. Please guide me.
The design is laid out here with config files for
On 3/23/2013 11:19 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 22/03/2013 11:05 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 22/03/2013 7:21 p.m., Sokvantha YOUK wrote:
Dear Amos,
I am pretty sure love to go down to try SMP equivalent of a CARP
peering. Please guide me.
The design is laid out here with config files for
On 3/22/2013 1:13 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 22/03/2013 4:39 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 03/21/2013 08:11 PM, Sokvantha YOUK wrote:
Thank you for your advice. If I want large files to be cached when it
fist seen by worker, My config should change to first worker that see
large file and
On 3/22/13 2:43 PM, babajaga wrote:
Your OS assigns workers to incoming connections. Squid does not control
that assignment. For the purposes of designing your storage, you may
assume that the next request goes to a random worker. Thus, each of your
workers must cache large files for files to be
Dear Amos,
I am pretty sure love to go down to try SMP equivalent of a CARP
peering. Please guide me.
---
Regards,
Vantha
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 22/03/2013 4:39 p.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
>>
>> On 03/21/2013 08:11 PM, Sokvantha YOUK wrote:
&
Dear Amos,
Thank you for your advice. I get it working now after shrink the
cache_dir size from 170GB to 70 GB. My total physical memory is 32 GB.
---
Regards,
Vantha
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 21/03/2013 9:21 p.m., Sokvantha YOUK wrote:
>>
>> De
02:21 AM, Sokvantha YOUK wrote:
>
>> ## 2. Handle large object > 32kb < 200MB. The fourth worker handles large
>> file
>> if ${process_number}=4
>> cache_dir aufs /cache7/squid/${process_number} 17 16 256
>> min-size=31001 max-size=2
&g
ote:
>
>> I am suspecting the problem is related to the WCCP default of waiting
>> until all caches are loaded before starting to advertise HERE_I_AM.
>> Scanning 1.4 TB of disk is going to take a while. Sokvantha YOUK was
>> waiting _only_ about ten minutes for WCCP packets.
&
Dear All,
I am working on distributed object cached by size to differences squid
process. My server is Centos 6 x64 bits with squid 3.3.3.
I don't know how to calculate maximum disk cache size squid can
support per process.
Below is my partition size:
#df
/dev/sdb1206424760 65884
Dear All,
Sorry for my confusion. This issue not yet solved even I use process macro.
---
Regards,
Vantha
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Sokvantha YOUK wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> My issue with WCCP is solved with following configuration:
>
> --- Using process macro to isolate ca
/cache7/squid/${process_number} 17 16 256
min-size=31001 max-size=2
cache_dir aufs /cache8/squid/${process_number} 17 16 256
min-size=31001 max-size=2
endif
Regards,
Vantha
Dear Amos,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Sokvantha YOUK wrote:
> Dear A
Dear All,
I am appreciate your expert advices on this matter :). I have tried
with following configuration but it is strange that WCCP2 is not
initiated the communication with Cisco Router. I were using this
configuration before, wccp2 was working fine.
Operation System: CentOS 6.4, x64 bits, Ker
Dear All,
I am going to build squid to supports 1 Gbps traffic on Centos 6 x64
bits. I have done some studying on getting squid to support this high
load traffic but I still not clear on some points below
1. Should I use SMP feature with 6 workers support and AUFS file system?
2. Or single squid
Dear All,
My squid server version 3.3.1-20130219-r12498 runs on Centos 6.3 x64
bits. The server runs with SMP enabled with 3 workers.
Most of the time when I type microsoft.com in Chrome, Firefox browser,
I got following error message:
" Your current User-Agent string appears to be from an auto
Dear All,
I am having squid 3.3.1-20130213-r12492 running on CenOS 6.3 x64. I enable
SMP with three worker on this squid server.
I am getting strange negative number from cachemgr.cgi at
Cache information for squid:
Hits as % of bytes sent: 5min: 9.3%, 60min: *-634.1%*
Would you advice me why I
Dear Every One,
I am implementing fully transparent squid using TPROXY and I followed
this http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4 document but I could
not get it works properly.
My Configuration is Fedora 16 x64 bits, Cisco ASR 1006 (IOS XE 2.06)
and squid version 3.1.19. Since I use mask a
17 matches
Mail list logo
