I am running squid on port 80 and apache on port 81
like this: http_port 80 accel vport=81
When I visit http://localhost:81/cgi-bin/cachemgr.cgi
I get
Cache Host:
Cache Port:
Manager name:
Password:
I enter localhost and 80.
When I click "Continue..." I am redirected to http://localhost:81/
and I
I tried installing the cachemgr.cgi from a stable release,
but it still just redirects me. I've carefully read and
followed the directions in the FAQ for configuring apache.
I don't think my httpd.conf file is the problem, though,
since I get the login page. Any ideas on things
to try would be ap
I upped the debugging level to 3 by editing the cachemgr.cc source code and
recompiling
squid. I also changed my httpd.conf a bit to allow directory indexing like
so:
Options Includes FollowSymLinks Indexes
Now I get this in my apache error log when I try to get in:
cmgr: encoding for pub...
It sounds like you're probably more advanced than I am with
squid, so I apologize if this is obvious, but I've learned some about
when things do and don't cache by lynxing pages through squid
and then lynxing them directly from the site & then comparing the headers
like this:
lynx -mime_header -dum
I've verified that my httpd.conf says:
Listen 81
..and my squid.conf says
http_port 80 accel vport=81
squid and apache are running on the same machine.
At any rate trying port 80 or 81 produces the same result.
From: Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Y Jones <[EMAIL
o-query default
Thanks again for the assistance.
From: Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Y Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users] cachemgr.cgi just redirects me
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:16:17 +0100 (CET)
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Y Jones wrote
I am running 3.0-PRE3-20031002 in accelerator mode on port 80 with apache on
port 81.
Here are the headers when fetching a page straight from apache:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 20:23:51 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.28 (Unix)
Cache-Control: max-age=86400
From: Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Y Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Squid Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [squid-users] TCP_REFRESH_HIT instead of TCP_HIT?
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 05:38:27 +0700
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 08:11, Y Jones wrote:
> I am running
No matter what number I set max-age to for Surrogate-Control, I get
TCP_REFRESH_HIT.
I have to unset the Surrogate-Control header to get a TCP_HIT. Can someone
tell
me how to set the headers to get a TCP_HIT with Surrogate-Control?
These are my apache headers that result in TCP_REFRESH_HIT:
HT
resh and more than 1 day old
Any advice or clarification of how this works would be appreciated.
Thanks.
From: "Y Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [squid-users] TCP_HIT with Surrogate-Control?
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 14:05:58 -0500
No matter what number I
te-Control: content="ESI/1.0"
From: Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Y Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users] TCP_HIT with Surrogate-Control? -related to
bug7?
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:38:40 +0100 (CET)
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Y Jo
11 matches
Mail list logo