in a couple of months?
Thanks
[snip, tangent]
--
ian j hart
.
If you can confirm that it may help one of the developers to find the
problem.
HTH
--
ian j hart
and each core is faster
so the startup ought to be much faster.
If anyone actually knows about this stuff feel free to interrupt me anytime
you like...
Hmmm, just noticed a strange thing, none of the external acls are on CPU0.
ian j hart wrote:
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 14:40:19 Rick
On Saturday 06 December 2008 21:10:35 Rick Chisholm wrote:
ian j hart wrote:
On Saturday 06 December 2008 19:52:10 Rick Chisholm wrote:
I seriously doubt it's an AMD thing.
I have an identically configured test server that does not exhibit the
same behaviour at all and the only real
On Sunday 23 March 2008 13:28:26 Amos Jeffries wrote:
ian j hart wrote:
On Sunday 23 March 2008 11:12:22 Amos Jeffries wrote:
Tim Bates wrote:
K K wrote:
For
Windows/MSIE the setting can be done automatically by WPAD, DHCP, or
GPO. For non-microsoft, this needs to be configured
On Monday 24 March 2008 03:05:06 Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Amos Jeffries wrote:
ian j hart wrote:
On Sunday 23 March 2008 11:12:22 Amos Jeffries wrote:
Tim Bates wrote:
K K wrote:
For
Windows/MSIE the setting can be done automatically by WPAD, DHCP, or
GPO. For non-microsoft, this needs
--
ian j hart
On Saturday 19 January 2008 22:15:45 Henrik Nordström wrote:
lör 2008-01-19 klockan 14:59 + skrev ian j hart:
PS. could you move patches to squid-dev or bugzilla please.
Okay, will do.
As I've stated previously I don't qualify to join that list. Given the
time zone difference I
On Saturday 19 January 2008 01:32:28 Amos Jeffries wrote:
ian j hart wrote:
On Friday 18 January 2008 20:10:07 ian j hart wrote:
On Friday 18 January 2008 00:51:40 ian j hart wrote:
The external_acl_type requests authentication since bug 1278 was fixed.
I have something like this (cut
On Saturday 19 January 2008 01:32:28 Amos Jeffries wrote:
ian j hart wrote:
On Friday 18 January 2008 20:10:07 ian j hart wrote:
On Friday 18 January 2008 00:51:40 ian j hart wrote:
The external_acl_type requests authentication since bug 1278 was fixed.
I have something like this (cut
On Friday 18 January 2008 20:10:07 ian j hart wrote:
On Friday 18 January 2008 00:51:40 ian j hart wrote:
The external_acl_type requests authentication since bug 1278 was fixed.
I have something like this (cut down and edited).
external_acl_type logger ttl=0 negative_ttl=0 children=1
On Friday 18 January 2008 00:51:40 ian j hart wrote:
The external_acl_type requests authentication since bug 1278 was fixed.
I have something like this (cut down and edited).
external_acl_type logger ttl=0 negative_ttl=0 children=1 %LOGIN ...
acl password proxy_auth REQUIRED
acl proxylist
= authenticateUserRequestUsername(request-auth_user_request);
Check the flag and set str=NULL?
Maybe there's a patch for this already? Or a wish list where I could post it.
Or is it near enough that someone could help me out?
Thanks
--
ian j hart
On Friday 11 January 2008 22:17:16 ian j hart wrote:
On Sunday 09 December 2007 07:03:24 Amos Jeffries wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting ian j hart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Friday 07 December 2007 23:49:35 Amos Jeffries wrote:
[Apologies in advance if I've miss-understood
On Sunday 09 December 2007 07:03:24 Amos Jeffries wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting ian j hart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Friday 07 December 2007 23:49:35 Amos Jeffries wrote:
[Apologies in advance if I've miss-understood anything, it's late
(early) and
I'm somewhat brain dead
the limit
for mbufs or clusters. I would say mbufs are not the issue.
Never had to tune files but
sysctl -a | grep files
would seem to be a good place to start.
kern.maxfiles: 12328
kern.maxfilesperproc: 11095
kern.openfiles: 318
p1003_1b.mapped_files: 1
HTH
--
ian j hart
On Saturday 08 December 2007 01:40:15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting ian j hart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Friday 07 December 2007 23:49:35 Amos Jeffries wrote:
[Apologies in advance if I've miss-understood anything, it's late (early)
and I'm somewhat brain dead. This time zone thing's
okay and safe?
I assume I'll need to patch clientAccessCheckDone2 as well.
Are all code paths (for access denied) covered?
Thanks again for all replies
--
ian j hart
On Saturday 08 December 2007 17:20:46 ian j hart wrote:
Okay I have something that seems to work.
Can I have a quick review, then I'll leave you in peace.
This may wrap.
--- src/client_side.c.orig Mon Sep 3 14:13:36 2007
+++ src/client_side.c Sat Dec 8 15:42:34 2007
@@ -425,6
On Friday 07 December 2007 23:49:35 Amos Jeffries wrote:
[Apologies in advance if I've miss-understood anything, it's late (early) and
I'm somewhat brain dead. This time zone thing's a killer]
ian j hart wrote:
On Friday 07 December 2007 00:58:31 Adrian Chadd wrote:
So if I get this right
descriptors and mbufs.
I ran 4.11 up to mid Feb this year. Don't have cache logs that far back.
IIRC I had to tune nmbclusters (32768).
If it's this you should be seeing
/kernel: All mbuf clusters exhausted, please see tuning(7).
in /var/log/messages
What does netstat -m say?
--
ian j hart
On Friday 07 December 2007 00:41:30 Amos Jeffries wrote:
On Thursday 06 December 2007 22:31:06 Amos Jeffries wrote:
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 17:04:09 ian j hart wrote:
Hello.
[sorry, slightly off topic]
I'm the ICT technician of a school. I have squid running to make
is only returned once, right? Which Is why I thought somewhere near there
would be about right. Just need a clue from someone who sees the whole
picture.
If you read this far, well done :)
Thanks
--
ian j hart
in this then please let me know and I'll pass on some
per-server and site pricing.
Thanks!
Thanks , I'll bear this in mind.
Adrian
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007, ian j hart wrote:
Hello.
[sorry, slightly off topic]
I'm the ICT technician of a school. I have squid running to make the most
of our
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 17:04:09 ian j hart wrote:
Hello.
[sorry, slightly off topic]
I'm the ICT technician of a school. I have squid running to make the most
of our bandwidth. Our ISP provides some content blocking but this is
proving ineffective against the proliferation of proxy
On Thursday 06 December 2007 22:31:06 Amos Jeffries wrote:
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 17:04:09 ian j hart wrote:
Hello.
[sorry, slightly off topic]
I'm the ICT technician of a school. I have squid running to make the
most
of our bandwidth. Our ISP provides some content blocking
.
Does anyone have anything like this?
N.B. This has to be user based. Host/IP based will not work due to the
hot seating.
Thanks
--
ian j hart
27 matches
Mail list logo
