In my experience. Uploads through a reverse proxy will add some
latency. May make the uploads unusable. It may be advisable to upload
directly to the origin server instead.
J
2008/12/24 ░▒▓ ɹɐzǝupɐɥʞ ɐzɹıɯ ▓▒░ mirz...@gmail.com:
is upload can be limit from squid ?
If you want to a load balancer for Squid servers then LVS is a good
option. Redhat even have a packaged version.
J
2008/12/23 Ken Peng kenp...@rambler.ru:
Hi All,
any links on how to configure load balancing of squid
See the default squid.conf, :)
For this 15-25MB/s, do you mean bits or bytes? Thanks
bits
Thanks John. for small files, why don't use GDSF on both locations?
I can't remember exactly - I'll probably compare them both again soon.
J
2008/12/7 Ken DBA [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--- On Sun, 12/7/08, john Moylan [EMAIL PROTECTED
I have a number of squid boxes behind LVS acting as reverse proxies.
They are all HP DL380/385's G4 Machines (about 3 years old) with 7GB
to 12 GB per machine, 4 unraided 15K SCSI HDD for caches on each
machine.
Mem Caches are 30% of the available ram on each box and each disk has
a 10GB cache.
I should add.. hit ratios are 90 or request but only 20-30% of volume
with my current solution. My requirement is to reduce load on the
backend.
J
2008/12/6 john Moylan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have a number of squid boxes behind LVS acting as reverse proxies.
They are all HP DL380/385's G4
Should I still leave 30% of my RAM for the OS's cache etc?
J
2008/11/13 Amos Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
john Moylan wrote:
Hi,
I am about to take ownership of a new 2CPU, 4 core server with 32GB of
RAM - I intend to add the server to my squid reverse proxy farm. My
site is approximately
Hi,
I am about to take ownership of a new 2CPU, 4 core server with 32GB of
RAM - I intend to add the server to my squid reverse proxy farm. My
site is approximately 300GB including archives and I think 32GB of
memory alone will suffice as cache for small, hot objects without
necessitating any
The OS file cache is Very important for most IO operations for most
applications - including Squid.
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 17:49 +, Paul Cocker wrote:
Is the OS file cache of any importance to squid? And by that I mean
quite simply, HOW important is the OS file cache to squid?
Paul
Some sites use dynamic DNS based on lookups to something like Maxmind or Quova.
J
On Dec 3, 2007 6:02 PM, Sascha Linn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I'm sure someone has to have dealt with this... but I cal only find
one hit in the archives
Items
0 on-disk objects
J
On Nov 26, 2007 2:55 PM, Tek Bahadur Limbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
John Moylan wrote:
Hi,
I have three memory only caches set up 7GB of memory each (the
machines have 12GB of physical memory each). Throughput is fairly high
and this setup
Hi,
I have three memory only caches set up 7GB of memory each (the
machines have 12GB of physical memory each). Throughput is fairly high
and this setup works well in reducing the number of requests for
smaller files from my backend storage with lower latency that a disk
and mem. solution.
This might suit your requirements better
http://gertjan.freezope.org/replicator/
Haven't tried it. Presume it's not as efficient as Squid as a cache.
On Nov 15, 2007 4:33 PM, bryan rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I want to run Squid as my proxy and get everything that passes through
- as I understand it
the problems in diskd are crashes under high load, not that it slows it down
right?
Thanks for the help
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Moylan
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 12:39 PM
To: Dave Raven
siblings of each other? Is it OK to ignore the
forwarding loop warnings in cache.log?
J
On Nov 6, 2007 7:29 AM, Amos Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Moylan wrote:
Hi,
I have 4 Squid 2.6 reverse proxy servers sitting behind an LVS
loadbalancer with 1 public IP address. In order
Hi,
I have 4 Squid 2.6 reverse proxy servers sitting behind an LVS
loadbalancer with 1 public IP address. In order to improve the hit
rate all 4 servers are all peering with eachother using ICP.
squid1 - sibling squid{2,3,4}
squid2 - sibling squid{1,3,4}
squid3 - sibling squid{1,2,4}
squid4 -
SNMP is good
http://www.squid-cache.org/~wessels/squid-rrd/
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 05:08 -0700, zulkarnain wrote:
Hi all,
I've squid running with 4GB of cache_mem, seemed my
squid unable to use 4GB of cache_mem. I would like to
know is there any tools to analyze cache_mem
utilization?
memory to ensure max
usage and help you to avoid swapping.
J
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 07:44 -0700, zulkarnain wrote:
--- John Moylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNMP is good
http://www.squid-cache.org/~wessels/squid-rrd/
Thanks John! But snmp still did not provide
utilization of usage
Hi,
That's only referring to the amount of memory currently consumed by the
memory cache. You should be able to see the figure growing as the memory
cache fills up.
J
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 07:50 -0700, zulkarnain wrote:
--- Gonzalo Arana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Have a look at
Hi,
Pages served via our reverse proxy squid seem to have a blank line
pre-pended to them. Is this normal? We are trying to validate mobile
XHTML and this is causing us issues.
Version 2.6.STABLE6 on Centos
Thanks,
J
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 03:23 -0700, Nadeem Semaan wrote:
I have noticed
Hi,
Please disregard, the issue is being caused by an web server module.
J
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 11:57 +0100, John Moylan wrote:
Hi,
Pages served via our reverse proxy squid seem to have a blank line
pre-pended to them. Is this normal? We are trying to validate mobile
XHTML
20 matches
Mail list logo
