On mån, 2007-08-06 at 10:50 +0200, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
I'm running squid (squid-2.6.STABLE6-4.el5) on an old IBM x330
server (2x 1266MHZ PIII, 1GB RAM, 2 mirrored 36GB disks for OS
and 20GB squid-spool), serving set-top-boxes' access to the
internet.
We have a feel for the proxy
I'm running squid (squid-2.6.STABLE6-4.el5) on an old IBM x330
server (2x 1266MHZ PIII, 1GB RAM, 2 mirrored 36GB disks for OS
and 20GB squid-spool), serving set-top-boxes' access to the
internet.
We have a feel for the proxy maybe being slow, but can't really
pinpoint what the problem might be.
Assuming you're running with diskd/aufs rather than ufs then I think
your numbers are alright. The default caching rules are quite permissive
and result in less caching than what might be possible, but more
correct caching.
You've paid for a support contract via Redhat - I suggest talking to
them
Router1 (Running Fedora Core 1)
Acting as a proxy server
squid-2.5.STABLE3-2.fc1
Router2 (Running Debian 3.1)
Acting as a parent proxy server
squid 2.5.9-10sarge2
squid-common 2.5.9-10sarge2
[Router1] --(2Mbps/384Kbps WAN)-- [Router2] --(3Mbps/3Mbps)-- Internet
Router1 internet access
english... ;o) )
Regards,
Cécile.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dimanche 23 mars 2003 13:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [squid-users] Performance Problem after Upgrading from
2.4.STABLE7 to 2.5.STABLE2
we want to update our squid-proxies.
we
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so we have compiled 2.5.STABLE2 modified the squid.conf. now we have the
problem, that the performance on our production system is very bad.
as long as only 1 user is accessing squid, performance is/seems ok.
this server is running under hp-ux 11.0
when all our
