I've got weird load behavior that crops up and this box is only
running squid. I am close to what I set my cache_dirs to in terms of
size, so wondering if that's it.
Just trying to figure out why my server will run at a load of 1 -1.5
and next thing it's up to 5-6, no real increase in traffic.
On Wed, 25 May 2011 18:29:55 -0700, Tory M Blue wrote:
I've got weird load behavior that crops up and this box is only
running squid. I am close to what I set my cache_dirs to in terms of
size, so wondering if that's it.
Just trying to figure out why my server will run at a load of 1 -1.5
and
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
high and low water for the disk were at 85 and 95%, bumped it just to
The watermark difference and total size determine how much disk gets erased
when it overflows. Could be lots or not much. Very likely this is it.
On Wed, 25 May 2011 20:27:05 -0700, Tory M Blue wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz
wrote:
high and low water for the disk were at 85 and 95%, bumped it just
to
The watermark difference and total size determine how much disk gets
erased
when it
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2011 20:27:05 -0700, Tory M Blue wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz
wrote:
backup, so I was leary. CPU cycles sure, but the squid process shows:
PID USER PR
On Wed, 25 May 2011 21:11:45 -0700, Tory M Blue wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz
wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2011 20:27:05 -0700, Tory M Blue wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Amos Jeffries
squ...@treenet.co.nz
wrote:
backup, so I was leary. CPU
