Thursday, September 18, 2008, 2:27:58 PM, you wrote:
> Pretty much. I've just applied the patch to 3.0 codebase, so it will be
> out in the next snapshot, or the patch is listed at:
>http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/changesets/
cool, thank you. Just applied it and it seems to work fi
Dietmar Braun wrote:
Hi,
Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 5:28:45 PM, you wrote:
This is a known bug:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2391
Thank you for the quick reply.
I have not investigated it myself, but the recommendation in the bug
report is to remove the assertion as i
Hi,
Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 5:28:45 PM, you wrote:
> This is a known bug:
> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2391
Thank you for the quick reply.
> I have not investigated it myself, but the recommendation in the bug
> report is to remove the assertion as it is incorrect.
D
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 16:00 +0200, Dietmar Braun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we were using Squid 3.0 STABLE8, now STABLE9. In both, we are
> experiencing squid dying with the following debug message:
>
> 2008/09/17 14:21:53| assertion failed: forward.cc:1209: "(fs->code ==
> HIER_DIRECT) == !fs->_peer"
> 2
Hi,
we were using Squid 3.0 STABLE8, now STABLE9. In both, we are
experiencing squid dying with the following debug message:
2008/09/17 14:21:53| assertion failed: forward.cc:1209: "(fs->code ==
HIER_DIRECT) == !fs->_peer"
2008/09/17 14:21:56| Squid is already running! Process ID 11415
2008/09/
