On fre, 2008-07-04 at 19:38 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I wonder why this ignore 100 expect behaviour isn't default.. Henrik,
> why isn't it default in 2.7 there are issues with the expect handling?
Processing Expect is a MUST level requirement.
The reason this in case of 100-continue this is th
* Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I wonder why this ignore 100 expect behaviour isn't default.. Henrik,
> why isn't it default in 2.7 there are issues with the expect handling?
Good question!
I would have expected 2.7.x to behave like 2.6.x (well, at least since
my switch to 3.0.x didn't brea
I wonder why this ignore 100 expect behaviour isn't default.. Henrik,
why isn't it default in 2.7 there are issues with the expect handling?
Adrian
2008/7/4 Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Dieter Bloms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> > I added this. Let's see how it goes.
>> > 2.6.x behaved
* Dieter Bloms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I added this. Let's see how it goes.
> > 2.6.x behaved differently in this regard?
>
> yes and 3.0 behaves differnt, too.
> I had the same problem with 2.7 so I switched to 3.0
I used 3.0.x but was bitten by the "empty pages" problem...
On fre, 2008-07-04 at 10:38 +0200, Dieter Bloms wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> On Fri, Jul 04, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > > ignore_expect_100 on
> >
> > I added this. Let's see how it goes.
> > 2.6.x behaved differently in this regard?
>
> yes and 3.0 behaves differnt, too.
3.0 is as ignorant about
* Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ignore_expect_100 on
Before:
1215157781.184 0 10.47.52.76 TCP_MISS/417 1811 CONNECT
drm.viasyshc.com:443 - NONE/- text/html
1215157782.410 0 10.47.52.75 TCP_MISS/417 1811 CONNECT
drm.viasyshc.com:443 - NONE/- text/html
After:
121516.207 3
Hi Ralf,
On Fri, Jul 04, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > ignore_expect_100 on
>
> I added this. Let's see how it goes.
> 2.6.x behaved differently in this regard?
yes and 3.0 behaves differnt, too.
I had the same problem with 2.7 so I switched to 3.0
--
GruĂ
Dieter
--
I do not get viruses be
On fre, 2008-07-04 at 09:50 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> I added this. Let's see how it goes.
> 2.6.x behaved differently in this regard?
Yes. 2.6 is quite ignorant about HTTP/1.1 requirements like Expect.
Regards
Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
* Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 1215083751.310 0 10.47.52.76 TCP_MISS/417 1811 CONNECT
> > drm.viasyshc.com:443 - NONE/- text/html
>
> 417 is Expectation Failed, and means the application sent an Expect:
> header which can not be fulfilled by Squid.
>
> Most likely this is "Exp
On tor, 2008-07-03 at 20:16 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Attaching the actual request thats being made would probably be a good
> > place to start :)
>
> Yes, how do I log this?
log_mime_hdrs on
Regards
Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a dig
On tor, 2008-07-03 at 16:43 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> A tool supposedly worked until May and now, due to the evil squid update
> to 2.7.x, won't work anymore. Of course squid is to blame, as always.
> Since we all know, the professional tool is written with great care,
> adhering to the spec
* Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Attaching the actual request thats being made would probably be a good
> place to start :)
Yes, how do I log this?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-15
Attaching the actual request thats being made would probably be a good
place to start :)
Adrian
2008/7/3 Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> A tool supposedly worked until May and now, due to the evil squid update
> to 2.7.x, won't work anymore. Of course squid is to blame, as always.
> Si
A tool supposedly worked until May and now, due to the evil squid update
to 2.7.x, won't work anymore. Of course squid is to blame, as always.
Since we all know, the professional tool is written with great care,
adhering to the specs and RFC by knowledgeable people. Unlike squid. Of
course. Call me
14 matches
Mail list logo
