On Thu, May 11, 2006, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> OK thank you. for now and about half a year i will survive the HDD load ;)
Its getting there! I've got an implementation of COSS which groks
64 bit file pointers and I've tested COSS up to ~30 gig stripes.
That was before I began the current work to f
OK thank you. for now and about half a year i will survive the HDD load ;)
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Mon, May 08, 2006, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
is COSS stable enough to use it in production? it will (in theory) be much
more I/O friendly.
Not yet. I'm doing quite a lot of work
On Tue, May 09, 2006, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> it probably really will. for example INN uses cyclic buffers which sresults
> to much faster news articles processing.
I'm sure it'll be much faster.
> On 09.05.06 07:27, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Not yet. I'm doing quite a lot of work at the m
> On Mon, May 08, 2006, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > is COSS stable enough to use it in production? it will (in theory) be
> > much more I/O friendly.
it probably really will. for example INN uses cyclic buffers which sresults
to much faster news articles processing.
On 09.05.06 07:27, Adrian Chadd
On Mon, May 08, 2006, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> is COSS stable enough to use it in production? it will (in theory) be much
> more I/O friendly.
Not yet. I'm doing quite a lot of work at the moment to make it
production-ready but I don't have a timeline.
Adrian
is COSS stable enough to use it in production? it will (in theory) be much
more I/O friendly.
thanks Wojtek
