Hi,
The list has been very quiet w/ regards to the coss storage.
1. is it still being developed/maintained?
2. is it production ready?
mike
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007, leongmzlist wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The list has been very quiet w/ regards to the coss storage.
>
> 1. is it still being developed/maintained?
> 2. is it production ready?
>From the reports from people using it, COSS is good enough to use for small
objects < a hundred or so kilob
I remember reading somewhere coss will be removed from the 3.0
release, just want to make sure it's won't get abandoned since our
cache data is really important to us.
mike
At 03:58 PM 10/3/2007, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007, leongmzlist wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The list has been very qui
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007, leongmzlist wrote:
> I remember reading somewhere coss will be removed from the 3.0
> release, just want to make sure it's won't get abandoned since our
> cache data is really important to us.
Squid-2 won't be abandoned for quite a while. If someone wants to sponsor
forward
On ons, 2007-10-03 at 17:19 -0700, leongmzlist wrote:
> I remember reading somewhere coss will be removed from the 3.0
> release, just want to make sure it's won't get abandoned since our
> cache data is really important to us.
It's not removed, but downgraded to experimental for 3.0, with updat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Leongmzlist,
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 14:57:17 -0700
leongmzlist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The list has been very quiet w/ regards to the coss storage.
>
> 1. is it still being developed/maintained?
> 2. is it production ready?
I am usi
rstag, 4. Oktober 2007 03:29
An: leongmzlist
Cc: Squid
Betreff: Re: [squid-users] COSS still under developement?
On ons, 2007-10-03 at 17:19 -0700, leongmzlist wrote:
> I remember reading somewhere coss will be removed from the 3.0
> release, just want to make sure it's won't ge
