Re: [squid-users] Caching URLs with a ? in them?

2013-02-13 Thread Scott Baker
On 02/13/2013 11:48 AM, Dave Dykstra wrote: > Scott, > > If it's just for logging purposes, it would be better to use an http > header such as User-Agent rather than putting it in the URL. It is part > of the http standard to use the whole URL as a caching index. Good point... I can send a head

Re: [squid-users] Caching URLs with a ? in them?

2013-02-13 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
On 2/13/2013 5:59 PM, Scott Baker wrote: The URL ONLY changes for logging purposes. The content being served is static. The serial number is ONLY preset so I can comb the logs and find who/when picked up a resource. Still the url is constantly changing and the proxy cannot know about any of the

Re: [squid-users] Caching URLs with a ? in them?

2013-02-13 Thread Scott Baker
On 02/12/2013 04:51 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: >> I have a bunch of static content with appropriate Expires headers, but >> the URL contains a "?serial=123456" where the serial number is dynamic. >> Is squid smart enough to ignore the fact that the URL looks like a >> dynamic request, > > It *is* a

Re: [squid-users] Caching URLs with a ? in them?

2013-02-12 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 13/02/2013 10:48 a.m., Scott Baker wrote: I have a bunch of static content with appropriate Expires headers, but the URL contains a "?serial=123456" where the serial number is dynamic. Is squid smart enough to ignore the fact that the URL looks like a dynamic request, It *is* a dynamic reque

[squid-users] Caching URLs with a ? in them?

2013-02-12 Thread Scott Baker
I have a bunch of static content with appropriate Expires headers, but the URL contains a "?serial=123456" where the serial number is dynamic. Is squid smart enough to ignore the fact that the URL looks like a dynamic request, and use the expire headers to see that it's indeed static/cacheable cont