RE: [squid-users] Challenge/Response with Cache Peers (NTLM)

2005-02-13 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Kinkie wrote: The login=*:password cache_peer option comes in handy for implementing this kind of scheme. Sure, but it requires a custom authenticator, or at least some kind of wrapper, which is certainly doable but not easy (might it be interesting to add something of the sort

RE: [squid-users] Challenge/Response with Cache Peers (NTLM)

2005-02-06 Thread Kinkie
is done at the child cache level. Kinkie -Original Message- From: Kinkie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 January 2005 11:34 AM To: squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: Re: [squid-users] Challenge/Response with Cache Peers (NTLM) On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 21:26 +0200, Dave

RE: [squid-users] Challenge/Response with Cache Peers (NTLM)

2005-02-06 Thread Kinkie
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 22:28 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Kinkie wrote: If so, it can't be done out of the box, and it's not trivial to implement (but possible). The login=*:password cache_peer option comes in handy for implementing this kind of scheme. Sure, but

RE: [squid-users] Challenge/Response with Cache Peers (NTLM)

2005-01-31 Thread Dave Raven
-Original Message- From: Kinkie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 January 2005 11:34 AM To: squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: Re: [squid-users] Challenge/Response with Cache Peers (NTLM) On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 21:26 +0200, Dave Raven wrote: Hi all, I've been testing the behavior

RE: [squid-users] Challenge/Response with Cache Peers (NTLM)

2005-01-31 Thread Dave Raven
-Original Message- From: Kinkie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 January 2005 11:34 AM To: squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: Re: [squid-users] Challenge/Response with Cache Peers (NTLM) On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 21:26 +0200, Dave Raven wrote: Hi all, I've been testing the behavior

Re: [squid-users] Challenge/Response with Cache Peers (NTLM)

2005-01-29 Thread Kinkie
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 21:26 +0200, Dave Raven wrote: Hi all, I've been testing the behavior of Challenge/Response today with cache peers. the versions etc are not relevant as I have Challenge/Response and BASIC working fine if I point directly to the unit. Below is a makeshift diagram

[squid-users] Challenge/Response with Cache Peers (NTLM)

2005-01-27 Thread Dave Raven
Hi all, I've been testing the behavior of Challenge/Response today with cache peers. the versions etc are not relevant as I have Challenge/Response and BASIC working fine if I point directly to the unit. Below is a makeshift diagram of how I've set this up now: -

[squid-users] Challenge/Response with Cache Peers (NTLM)

2005-01-27 Thread Dave Raven
Hi all, I've been testing the behavior of Challenge/Response today with cache peers. the versions etc are not relevant as I have Challenge/Response and BASIC working fine if I point directly to the unit. Below is a makeshift diagram of how I've set this up now: -