Re: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-24 Thread Henrik Nordström
mån 2008-02-18 klockan 12:57 + skrev Sven Edge: > In the 2.5 config, > httpd_accel_host virtual > and possibly also > httpd_accel_single_host off > httpd_accel_uses_host_header on > mean that web servers are chosen from our internal DNS, without needing > to be hardcoded as c

Re: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-21 Thread Amos Jeffries
Sven Edge wrote: From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sven Edge wrote: Poking around the source for the squid-2.6.STABLE17 release currently in Fedora, there's appears to be another source of DIRECT_NO besides a never_direct, in peer_select.c. http://www.squid-cache.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb

RE: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-20 Thread Sven Edge
>From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sven Edge wrote: >> >> Poking around the source for the squid-2.6.STABLE17 release >currently in >> Fedora, there's appears to be another source of DIRECT_NO besides a >> never_direct, in peer_select.c. >> http://www.squid-cache.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.

Re: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-19 Thread Amos Jeffries
Sven Edge wrote: From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sven Edge wrote: From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I think that's what I'm trying, and it fails to find a web server to talk to. Hmm, you can do a spot-check on squid with "squidclient mgr:ipcache | grep www.scran.a

RE: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-19 Thread Sven Edge
>From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sven Edge wrote: >>> From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> I think that's what I'm trying, and it fails to find a web server to >> talk to. > >Hmm, you can do a spot-check on squid with >"squidclient mgr:ipcache | grep www.scran.a

Re: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-19 Thread Amos Jeffries
Sven Edge wrote: From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there a way to do this in 2.6? Yes, with a little trickery in DNS. You need to use DNS-views so that the public see squid as being an A/ for the domain and squid does not. If squid ever find itself as a source server for a

RE: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-19 Thread Sven Edge
>From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Is there a way to do this in 2.6? > >Yes, with a little trickery in DNS. You need to use DNS-views >so that the >public see squid as being an A/ for the domain and squid >does not. If >squid ever find itself as a source server for any of th

Re: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-18 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > Is there a way to do this in 2.6? > > Yes, with a little trickery in DNS. You need to use DNS-views so that the > public see squid as being an A/ for the domain and squid does not. If > squid ever find itself as a source server for any of the dom

Re: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-18 Thread Amos Jeffries
> Hi there, > > I'm trying to upgrade our reverse proxy setup from 2.5 to 2.6, and > understand that the relevant config words have changed, but I'm not sure > how to emulate our current setup. > > In the 2.5 config, > httpd_accel_host virtual > and possibly also > httpd_accel_single_ho

[squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-18 Thread Sven Edge
Hi there, I'm trying to upgrade our reverse proxy setup from 2.5 to 2.6, and understand that the relevant config words have changed, but I'm not sure how to emulate our current setup. In the 2.5 config, httpd_accel_host virtual and possibly also httpd_accel_single_host off