RE: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Dean Weimer
Grandemange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 6:57 AM To: 'Henrik Nordstrom' Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: RE: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9 > How and why would this happen? The box hasn't been powered off in months. > Also

RE: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Marcel Grandemange
> How and why would this happen? The box hasn't been powered off in months. > Also first time something like this has happened. > So far im guesing it was upgrade to stable 10 that mucked things up. > Personally ive never had so many issues with any particular version of > squid. >As Amos already

Re: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Amos Jeffries
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: On tis, 2008-11-18 at 21:14 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: Do you have the same 64/32 bit settings and --with-large-files on both builds? Didn't we make the cache and swap.state format large-files independent in Squid-3? Not 3.0 that I know of. Certainly not different b

RE: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On tis, 2008-11-18 at 12:01 +0200, Marcel Grandemange wrote: > How and why would this happen? The box hasn't been powered off in months. > Also first time something like this has happened. > So far im guesing it was upgrade to stable 10 that mucked things up. > Personally ive never had so many iss

RE: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Marcel Grandemange
> Good day. > > Im wondering if anybody could shed some light for me. > > Ive had to downgrade a machine of mine due to bugs in stable10, > however since the downgrade im noticing a HELL of a lot of "TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200" > Messages in access.log. And I do mean an extreme amount. > > Any ideas

RE: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Marcel Grandemange
> Good day. > > Im wondering if anybody could shed some light for me. > > Ive had to downgrade a machine of mine due to bugs in stable10, however > since the downgrade im noticing a HELL of a lot of "TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200" > Messages in access.log. And I do mean an extreme amount. > > Any ideas?

Re: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On tis, 2008-11-18 at 21:14 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > Do you have the same 64/32 bit settings and --with-large-files on both > builds? Didn't we make the cache and swap.state format large-files independent in Squid-3? Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed me

Re: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On tis, 2008-11-18 at 09:47 +0200, Marcel Grandemange wrote: > Good day. > > Im wondering if anybody could shed some light for me. > > Ive had to downgrade a machine of mine due to bugs in stable10, however > since the downgrade im noticing a HELL of a lot of "TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200" > Messages in

Re: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Amos Jeffries
Marcel Grandemange wrote: Good day. Im wondering if anybody could shed some light for me. Ive had to downgrade a machine of mine due to bugs in stable10, however since the downgrade im noticing a HELL of a lot of "TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200" Messages in access.log. And I do mean an extreme amount.

[squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-17 Thread Marcel Grandemange
Good day. Im wondering if anybody could shed some light for me. Ive had to downgrade a machine of mine due to bugs in stable10, however since the downgrade im noticing a HELL of a lot of "TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200" Messages in access.log. And I do mean an extreme amount. Any ideas?