On mån, 2008-07-14 at 02:25 -0700, bijayant kumar wrote:
> In my observations since Squid is a single threaded(not a multithread)
> s/w, so there is no need to use dual/quad core processor, and RAM is
> also not very important factor because somewhere i read, "10MB RAM for
> every 1 GB of cache s
While more/faster is always better, that's not what I'm arguing - I'll
take the fastest CPU budget allows and as many cores as they'll let me
buy :) In particular, more CPU *does* help when you have dozens of
helper apps such as authenticators or url rewriters.
I think the point of the argu
> third, AM2 Quad (phenom)
>
I labeled the two last msgs wrong, X2 = X4 and X4 = X2, the image name is
correct
> michel
>
>
>
>
>
> Tecnologia Internet Matik http://info.matik.com.br
> Sistemas Wireless para o Provedor Banda Larga
> Hospedag
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:51:50AM -0300, Michel wrote:
> and the whole issue again and again is understated, at least you
> guys admit already dualcores ...
>
> I really do not understand the resistance, there *_IS_NO_* doubth
> that an 8core machine is faster than a twocore - and whatever
> soft
third, AM2 Quad (phenom)
michel
Tecnologia Internet Matik http://info.matik.com.br
Sistemas Wireless para o Provedor Banda Larga
Hospedagem e Email personalizado - e claro, no Brasil.
<>
here the second image, AM2 X2
michel
Tecnologia Internet Matik http://info.matik.com.br
Sistemas Wireless para o Provedor Banda Larga
Hospedagem e Email personalizado - e claro, no Brasil.
> Hi,
>
> One thing to keep in mind is that in my experience, it makes sense to
> not only get fast disks, but put as much RAM in the box you can
> afford. Now *don't* give this all the squid via the mem_cache config;
> let the OS use the spare memory for caching disk reads. This will spee
>
> Addi
Hi,
One thing to keep in mind is that in my experience, it makes sense to
not only get fast disks, but put as much RAM in the box you can
afford. Now *don't* give this all the squid via the mem_cache config;
let the OS use the spare memory for caching disk reads. This will spee
Additional
Anna Jonna Armannsdottir wrote:
On mán, 2008-07-14 at 13:01 +0200, Angelo Hongens wrote:
All the servers I usually buy have either one or two quad core cpu's,
so it's more the question: will 8 cores perform better than 4?
If not, I would be wiser to buy a single Xeon X5460 or so, instead of
2 l
On mán, 2008-07-14 at 13:01 +0200, Angelo Hongens wrote:
>
> All the servers I usually buy have either one or two quad core cpu's,
> so it's more the question: will 8 cores perform better than 4?
>
> If not, I would be wiser to buy a single Xeon X5460 or so, instead of
> 2 lower clocked cpu's, ri
Anna Jonna Armannsdottir wrote:
> With todays hardware, wich is often dual processor by default, there are
> very little savings using only one processor. Chances are that Your
> users will hate the proxy server, if it turns out to be a bottleneck
> during heavy load.
>
I'm not running any squid
On mán, 2008-07-14 at 02:25 -0700, bijayant kumar wrote:
> In my observations since Squid is a single threaded(not a multithread)
> s/w, so there is no need to use dual/quad core processor, and RAM is
> also not very important factor because somewhere i read, "10MB RAM for
> every 1 GB of cache spa
Hello to list,
I am using squid 3.0.STABLE7. Can i use squid for caching server in a ISP like
environment. If yes, then what should be the H/W configuration? I have gone
through to various articles found in google.
In my observations since Squid is a single threaded(not a multithread) s/w, so
13 matches
Mail list logo
