Hello All,
I have a list of urls to be blocked in a text file and the size of it is
4MB. Squid has been configured to use this to match the requested urls
and configuration is given below.
acl blocked url_regex '/usr/local/squid/blocked.txt'
http_access deny blocked
This is working perfectly
Sekar wrote:
Hello All,
I have a list of urls to be blocked in a text file and the size of it is
4MB. Squid has been configured to use this to match the requested urls
and configuration is given below.
Hi Sekar,
A text file of size 4 MB! It must contain at least 30 thousand entries.
acl
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 23:56 +0545, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
> Using dstdomain in place of url_regex if applicable will probably reduce
> your overall CPU usage.
and memory usage.. regex is quite memory hungry..
Regards
Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I have the following settings in my squid.conf file relating to the
memory usage:
cache_mem 200 MB
maximum_object_size_in_memory 512 KB
cache_replacement_policy heap GDSF
memory_replacement_policy heap GDSF
cache_dir diskd /var/spool/squid 200 16 256
cache_swap_high 100%
cache_swap_low 80%
Th
With only 200mb available to the system I would turn the size in memory
down to 64k or lower.
-
Signed,
Fix Nichols
http://www.squidblacklist.org
On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 17:43:58 +0100
Mr Dash Four wrote:
> I have the following settings in my squid.conf file relating to the
> memory usage:
>
> cache_mem 200 MB
> maximum_object_size_in_memory 512 KB
>
> cache_replacement_policy heap GDSF
> memory_replacement_policy heap GDSF
> cache_dir disk
Squidblacklist wrote:
With only 200mb available to the system I would turn the size in memory
down to 64k or lower.
In other words change "maximum_object_size_in_memory 512 KB" to
"maximum_object_size_in_memory 64 KB" or less? Is that what is causing
this? The cache logs tell me this:
Lo
I have the following settings in my squid.conf file relating to the
memory usage:
cache_mem 200 MB
maximum_object_size_in_memory 512 KB
cache_replacement_policy heap GDSF
memory_replacement_policy heap GDSF
cache_dir diskd /var/spool/squid 200 16 256 <
200kb? thats less than 1 mb
Well you can have max cachemem object set to 512k, but only if you give
it something reasonable like, 2GB of ram or more, as opposed to the
200mb it currently has. Because with it set to 512k its filling your
ram up very quickly with large objects, if you insist on only allowing
200mb ram for squid
Squidblacklist wrote:
Well you can have max cachemem object set to 512k, but only if you give
it something reasonable like, 2GB of ram or more, as opposed to the
200mb it currently has. Because with it set to 512k its filling your
ram up very quickly with large objects, if you insist on only al
I believe I have seen similar issues before when users set the max ram
and the disk size to the same exact settings, might I suggest you
increase the storage available from 200mb to 300mb, and test. Its worth
a shot.
-
Signed,
Fix Nichols
http://www.squidblacklist.org
Squidblacklist wrote:
I believe I have seen similar issues before when users set the max ram
and the disk size to the same exact settings, might I suggest you
increase the storage available from 200mb to 300mb, and test. Its worth
a shot.
OK, I'll give it a go. Do I have to completely restar
Il 09/04/2013 19:33, Mr Dash Four ha scritto:
> [snip]
if the maximum_object_size_in_memory is reduced,
then I suppose squid's memory footprint will have to go down too, which
makes the cache_mem option a bit useless.
I think will just store more objects in RAM.
--
Marcello Romani
Marcello Romani wrote:
Il 09/04/2013 19:33, Mr Dash Four ha scritto:
> [snip]
if the maximum_object_size_in_memory is reduced,
then I suppose squid's memory footprint will have to go down too, which
makes the cache_mem option a bit useless.
I think will just store more objects in RAM.
I am
Il 10/04/2013 13:59, Mr Dash Four ha scritto:
Marcello Romani wrote:
Il 09/04/2013 19:33, Mr Dash Four ha scritto:
> [snip]
if the maximum_object_size_in_memory is reduced,
then I suppose squid's memory footprint will have to go down too, which
makes the cache_mem option a bit useless.
I th
Il 10/04/2013 14:29, Marcello Romani ha scritto:
Il 10/04/2013 13:59, Mr Dash Four ha scritto:
Marcello Romani wrote:
Il 09/04/2013 19:33, Mr Dash Four ha scritto:
> [snip]
if the maximum_object_size_in_memory is reduced,
then I suppose squid's memory footprint will have to go down too, whic
>
> As an addition to my previous comment, please read this comment in
> squid.conf (3.1.6 FWIW):
>
> # TAG: store_avg_object_size (kbytes)
> # Average object size, used to estimate number of objects your
> # cache can hold.
>
May I chime in? ^ That's an interesting directive that I ha
Marcello Romani wrote:
Il 10/04/2013 13:59, Mr Dash Four ha scritto:
Marcello Romani wrote:
Il 09/04/2013 19:33, Mr Dash Four ha scritto:
> [snip]
if the maximum_object_size_in_memory is reduced,
then I suppose squid's memory footprint will have to go down too,
which
makes the cache_mem
As an addition to my previous comment, please read this comment in
squid.conf (3.1.6 FWIW):
# TAG: store_avg_object_size (kbytes)
# Average object size, used to estimate number of objects your
# cache can hold.
I don't see how this helps fixing the problem I described in my initial
pos
On 04/10/2013 09:22 AM, Mr Dash Four wrote:
> the total memory used of all objects placed in ram should
> not be 6 times the cache_mem value
There is no such rule or law of physics. cache_mem is not squid_mem (a
not-yet-supported option that would limit total Squid memory usage).
The total memor
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 04/10/2013 09:22 AM, Mr Dash Four wrote:
the total memory used of all objects placed in ram should
not be 6 times the cache_mem value
There is no such rule or law of physics. cache_mem is not squid_mem (a
not-yet-supported option that would limit total Squid
Gentlemen, this exchange is not even close to being constructive, let us
start over shall we.
Please, give us your entire squid.conf and version, as well as your OS
and Kernel version.
-
Signed,
Fix Nichols
http://www.squidblacklist.org
Il 10/04/2013 17:22, Mr Dash Four ha scritto:
the memory usage should be dependent on the cache_mem parameter (give or
take a certain amount of memory needed for managing the disk cache)
cache_mem doesn't specify the amount of memory needed for managing the
disk cache.
http://wiki.squid-cach
Il 10/04/2013 17:22, Mr Dash Four ha scritto:
As an addition to my previous comment, please read this comment in
squid.conf (3.1.6 FWIW):
# TAG: store_avg_object_size (kbytes)
# Average object size, used to estimate number of objects your
# cache can hold.
I don't see how this helps fi
Il 10/04/2013 17:22, Mr Dash Four ha scritto:
Marcello Romani wrote:
Il 10/04/2013 13:59, Mr Dash Four ha scritto:
Marcello Romani wrote:
Il 09/04/2013 19:33, Mr Dash Four ha scritto:
> [snip]
if the maximum_object_size_in_memory is reduced,
then I suppose squid's memory footprint will ha
On 11/04/2013 7:11 p.m., Marcello Romani wrote:
Il 10/04/2013 17:22, Mr Dash Four ha scritto:
Marcello Romani wrote:
Il 10/04/2013 13:59, Mr Dash Four ha scritto:
Marcello Romani wrote:
Il 09/04/2013 19:33, Mr Dash Four ha scritto:
> [snip]
if the maximum_object_size_in_memory is reduced
On 04/10/2013 03:37 PM, Mr Dash Four wrote:
> Alex Rousskov wrote:
>> The total memory used by Squid is, roughly:
>>
>>1) initial memory used by Squid shortly after start +
>>2) memory used to store memory-cached objects +
>>3a) memory used to index memory-cached objects +
>>3b) mem
Mr Dash Four wrote:
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 04/10/2013 09:22 AM, Mr Dash Four wrote:
the total memory used of all objects placed in ram should
not be 6 times the cache_mem value
There is no such rule or law of physics. cache_mem is not squid_mem (a
not-yet-supported option that would
On 10/08/2013 11:22 p.m., Dash Four wrote:
It needs to be noted that there is no (significant) differences in the
configuration between the old and the new versions, apart from minor
corrections to account for changed option names (transition from 3.2.0
to 3.3.4). There isn't any difference in
29 matches
Mail list logo
