On Wed, Sep 19, 2007, Ding Deng wrote:
It'd mean more RAM used to track expired objects, and more CPU to walk
the list and delete unneeded objects..
And probably longer disk seek time.
Depends how its done. Doing it on a busy UFS might mess with your
service times.
Agreed. We still have
On 19-Sep-07 My Secret NSA Wiretap Overheard Adrian Chadd Saying :
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007, Nicole wrote:
Thanks for the clarification, but Eeek!
Whats eek about it!
True. After I left work (and boss breathing down at me) I realized how silly
my post was. *sigh*
So then, I guess
On ons, 2007-09-19 at 10:56 -0700, Nicole wrote:
I tried this, but it did not do that much. Could you explain more about what
this does? Is it rebuilding swap.state, based on what files you have in your
cache, or is it removing listings from swap.state for files that you no longer
seem to
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
Was the old setting for lru_reference_age (or something like that) to aid in
setting a you must be younger than this or frequently accessed to stay in
my
cache?
Don't remember exactly what this option did unfortunately. Was quite
long
On 19-Sep-07 My Secret NSA Wiretap Overheard Adrian Chadd Saying :
Files aren't deleted when they expire.
Files are deleted when:
* A request occurs and squid checks the file for freshness, or
* Squid issues a validation requests and determines the local copy is stale,
or
* Squid needs
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007, Nicole wrote:
Thanks for the clarification, but Eeek!
Whats eek about it!
So then, I guess this raises the question: If you have plenty of disk, there
really is nothing from keeping ancient files hanging around, using up space
and enlarging your swap.state file?
Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007, Nicole wrote:
Thanks for the clarification, but Eeek!
Whats eek about it!
So then, I guess this raises the question: If you have plenty of
disk, there really is nothing from keeping ancient files hanging
around, using up
