I wonder if anyone has a good I/O test which will sort of represent
the way squid needed the I/O to perform. Basically I need one program
which I can use to check the influence of various components of the
system ( OS, parameters, harddisk, library version ) on the I/O for
maximizing
squid perform
On mån, 2007-08-13 at 12:06 +0800, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:
>
> It seems that the I/O on uclibc-based system runs better than a FC5
> system.
> This is will opposite to my expectation. I am not sure if the
> conclusion
> will
> be applicable to running squid.
Shouldn't have much effect on Squid as
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Shouldn't have much effect on Squid as Squid is using direct POSIX I/O,
>and not C "stdio" I/O, bypassing almost all of the C library.
That's why I asked the question, what will be the test which I can
run to verify the performance of IO needed
On tis, 2007-08-14 at 11:00 +0800, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:
> I am having a system which handles about 9000 active sessions
> now, and the iostat result is as such :-
>
> avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
>0.92 0.001.09 6.16 0.00
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
>>0.92 0.001.09 6.16 0.00
91.83
>
>
> It's not much blocking on disk I/O either, only 6.16%. 91.83% of the
> time your server is doing
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:
> You are obsolutely right about that observation, unfortunately I did not
> know how to deal with this transition and users are complaining slow
> http response and I had to put Squid off-line. From being able to
> handle 9000 requests concurrently, I
From: "Adrian Chadd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Did you try COSS?
>
> Commercial units have had a lot more attention. Chances are you've
> not gotten someone with Squid expertise to se any of your stuff up
> or do any deep analysis of the problems; what did you expect
> would happen?
>
>
Is ther
