>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: projpr...@virgilio.it
>Data: 24-gen-2011 
8.34
>A: <squ...@treenet.co.nz>
>Ogg: R: Re: [squid-users] R: Re: [squid-users] 
Squid - ldap auth against active directory 2008 R2
>
>Thanks a lot for your 
reply.
>
>this sounds really good...strange that on 
>opensuse i don´t have the 
same problem like on the server....
>Anyway, I would 
>like to make the test 
you suggested.
>
>the user is squid...but which is the 
>standard password?
>

>Thanks again.
>
>
>>----Messaggio originale----
>>Da: 
>squ...@treenet.co.nz

>>Data: 21-gen-2011 13.47
>>A: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
>
>>Ogg: Re: 
[squid-users] R: Re: [squid-users] Squid - ldap auth against active 
>directory 
2008 R2
>>
>>On 22/01/11 00:41, projpr...@virgilio.it wrote:
>>> Thanks 
>a lot 
for you reply!
>>> this gives me a bit of courage...
>>>
>>> well, I made
>>> 

>some test from a opensuse machine and it looks like it works...
>>> now, if i 

>look
>>> at the process monitor with dependencies and thread on the original 

>machine i
>>> have
>>> owner    process   id
>>> root       squid      5037

>>>     
>|
>>>     |
>>>     squid
>>> squid       4033
>>>        |

>>>        |
>>>        |
>
>>>        squid   squid-ldap  10370
>>>
>>> 
..........
>>>
>>> I must say that i 
>also mixed up the squid version: i´m 
using 3.0
>>> Stable 9.
>>>
>>> Do you think 
>it´s cause the helper run under 
squid?
>>> Should i insert
>>> squid in the root 
>group?
>>
>>No.
>>
>>At the 
command line before testing the helper set yourself to 
>the squid 
>>effective 
user using the "su" utility. Usually that is "nobody" or 
>
>>"proxy" or 
"squid", though it may differ for your system.
>>
>>Then run the 
>helper 
testing to find out what is broken.
>>
>>Amos
>>-- 
>>Please be using
>>   

>Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.10
>>   Beta testers wanted for 
3.2.0.4
>
>>
>

>                                                                               
>                                                                        


                                                                                
                                                                      

Reply via email to