[squid-users] I want to verify why squid wont cache a specific object.

2012-08-19 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
I have been checking out about IMDB videos and it seems like the original requests cannot be cached from an unknown reason. the store log shows: 1345335832.436 RELEASE -1 B174D16A30640884673D882B55B3594C 200 1334135877 1302715098-1 video/mp4 16586249/16586249 GET

Re: [squid-users] I want to verify why squid wont cache a specific object.

2012-08-19 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 20.08.2012 10:10, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: I have been checking out about IMDB videos and it seems like the original requests cannot be cached from an unknown reason. the store log shows: 1345335832.436 RELEASE -1 B174D16A30640884673D882B55B3594C 200 1334135877 1302715098-1

Re: [squid-users] I want to verify why squid wont cache a specific object.

2012-08-19 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
On 8/20/2012 1:38 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: The is the file number/name where it is being stored. Since this is an erased operation that is always the magic F value. It is not 1-to-1 related to the object being cacheable. It just means the object *currently* stored needs removing.

Re: [squid-users] I want to verify why squid wont cache a specific object.

2012-08-19 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
On 8/20/2012 2:37 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: On 8/20/2012 1:38 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: The is the file number/name where it is being stored. Since this is an erased operation that is always the magic F value. It is not 1-to-1 related to the object being cacheable. It just means the

Re: [squid-users] I want to verify why squid wont cache a specific object.

2012-08-19 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 20.08.2012 11:37, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: On 8/20/2012 1:38 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: The is the file number/name where it is being stored. Since this is an erased operation that is always the magic F value. It is not 1-to-1 related to the object being cacheable. It just means the

Re: [squid-users] I want to verify why squid wont cache a specific object.

2012-08-19 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 20.08.2012 12:22, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: On 8/20/2012 2:37 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: On 8/20/2012 1:38 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: The is the file number/name where it is being stored. Since this is an erased operation that is always the magic F value. It is not 1-to-1 related

Re: [squid-users] I want to verify why squid wont cache a specific object.

2012-08-19 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
On 8/20/2012 4:03 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: If you wish. It is a minor regression for the use-cases where traffic is being fetched from sources other than ORIGINAL_DST. That content should still be cacheable as it was before. It is done this way for now so that swapping ORIGINAL_DST in for

Re: [squid-users] I want to verify why squid wont cache a specific object.

2012-08-19 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
On 8/20/2012 3:45 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: Two possibilities: 1) Did you bump up the maximum_object_size? default being 4MB and these objects are ~16MB. my limit is 200MB 2) They are dynamic objects without any Cache-Control or Expires header to explicitly state the cacheability age. That