HI There,
I was wondering whether it's posible to mark cached traffic with a different
TOS then uncached traffic. I need to come up with a way of passing cached
traffic through our bandwidth manager without taxing the end user for it.
Basically giving them the full benefits of the proxy server
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008, Stephan Viljoen wrote:
> HI There,
>
> I was wondering whether it's posible to mark cached traffic with a
> different TOS then uncached traffic. I need to come up with a way of
> passing cached traffic through our bandwidth manager without taxing the end
> user for it. Bas
> HI There,
>
> I was wondering whether it's posible to mark cached traffic with a
> different
> TOS then uncached traffic. I need to come up with a way of passing cached
> traffic through our bandwidth manager without taxing the end user for it.
> Basically giving them the full benefits of the pro
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008, Stephan Viljoen wrote:
HI There,
I was wondering whether it's posible to mark cached traffic with a
different TOS then uncached traffic. I need to come up with a way of
passing cached traffic through our bandwidth manager without t
Manoj_Rajkarnikar wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008, Stephan Viljoen wrote:
HI There,
I was wondering whether it's posible to mark cached traffic with a
different TOS then uncached traffic. I need to come up with a way of
passing cached traffic through our b
Excellent news.
- Original Message -
From: "Amos Jeffries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Manoj_Rajkarnikar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Marking Cached traffic..
Manoj_Rajkarnikar wrote:
O
ons 2008-04-16 klockan 16:24 +0200 skrev Stephan Viljoen:
> I was wondering whether it's posible to mark cached traffic with a different
> TOS then uncached traffic. I need to come up with a way of passing cached
> traffic through our bandwidth manager without taxing the end user for it.
> Basic
