Re: [squid-users] Maxconn and Indirect client

2012-04-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 17.04.2012 03:37, FredB wrote: maxconn is a inbound connection limit. Squid cannot reasonably control TCP connections which are made by other software to DG since Squid has no part in those connections. There is simply no relevance limiting maxconn on anything except the real TCP/IP details.

Re: [squid-users] Maxconn and Indirect client

2012-04-16 Thread FredB
> > maxconn is a inbound connection limit. Squid cannot reasonably > control > TCP connections which are made by other software to DG since Squid > has > no part in those connections. There is simply no relevance limiting > maxconn on anything except the real TCP/IP details. Yes, but like there

Re: [squid-users] Maxconn and Indirect client

2012-04-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 16/04/2012 9:23 p.m., FredB wrote: Hi, I read that maxconn directive use only the direct IP addresses, my problem is that I'm working with Danguardian tool for filtering and it works before squid. Previously I had this (almost) kind of problem with delay pools resolved by an acl on ldap ac

[squid-users] Maxconn and Indirect client

2012-04-16 Thread FredB
Hi, I read that maxconn directive use only the direct IP addresses, my problem is that I'm working with Danguardian tool for filtering and it works before squid. Previously I had this (almost) kind of problem with delay pools resolved by an acl on ldap account. There is a way to use the user's