hello all,
I currently get some sun v210 boxes running solaris 8 and squid-2.6.12
and samba 3.0.20b I will upgrade these proxies into 2.7.4/3.0.32 next
monday but before doing this I would like to ask you your advices and/or
experiences with tuning these kind of boxes.
the service is running wel
>
>hello all,
>
>I currently get some sun v210 boxes running solaris 8 and squid-2.6.12
>and samba 3.0.20b I will upgrade these proxies into 2.7.4/3.0.32 next
>monday but before doing this I would like to ask you your advices
and/or
>experiences with tuning these kind of boxes.
>
>the service is ru
>>
>>hello all,
>>
>>I currently get some sun v210 boxes running solaris 8 and squid-2.6.12
>>and samba 3.0.20b I will upgrade these proxies into 2.7.4/3.0.32 next
>>monday but before doing this I would like to ask you your advices
> and/or
>>experiences with tuning these kind of boxes.
>>
>>the se
>>>
>>>hello all,
>>>
>>>I currently get some sun v210 boxes running solaris 8 and
squid-2.6.12
>>>and samba 3.0.20b I will upgrade these proxies into 2.7.4/3.0.32 next
>>>monday but before doing this I would like to ask you your advices
>> and/or
>>>experiences with tuning these kind of boxes.
>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello all,
I currently get some sun v210 boxes running solaris 8 and
squid-2.6.12
and samba 3.0.20b I will upgrade these proxies into 2.7.4/3.0.32 next
monday but before doing this I would like to ask you your advices
and/or
experiences with tuning these kind of boxe
> hello all,
>
> I currently get some sun v210 boxes running solaris 8 and
>> squid-2.6.12
> and samba 3.0.20b I will upgrade these proxies into 2.7.4/3.0.32
next
> monday but before doing this I would like to ask you your advices
and/or
> experiences with tuning these
Before digging deep into OS settings check your squid.conf auth,
acl
>>> and
http_access settings.
>>>
>>> okay let's go concerning auth part of the squid.conf, I would like
to
>>> say, nothing special .. below the ntlm config part
>>>
>>> auth_param ntlm program /usr/local/bin/ntlm_a
On ons, 2008-11-19 at 19:39 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>auth_param ntlm ttl
> >
> >do you advice using it because I do not find any reference on it on
> squid configuration guide website.
> >
>
> you spoke about ttl parameter .. do you advice using it ??
Not sure who spoke about an auth_
>> >>auth_param ntlm ttl
>> >
>> >do you advice using it because I do not find any reference on it on
>> squid configuration guide website.
>> >
>>
>> you spoke about ttl parameter .. do you advice using it ??
>
>Not sure who spoke about an auth_param ntlm ttl parameter, but there is
>no such pa
On ons, 2008-11-19 at 20:29 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> okay but I already get 128 ntlm_auth processes running .. is this enough
> for a load of 250 req/sec ??
Can't say. Do you get any relevant warnings in cache.log? And what does
cachemgr say about the helper usage?
> on the other hand,
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On ons, 2008-11-19 at 19:39 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
auth_param ntlm ttl
do you advice using it because I do not find any reference on it on
squid configuration guide website.
you spoke about ttl parameter .. do you advice using it ??
Not sure who spoke about
11 matches
Mail list logo
