Re: [squid-users] New Patches

2005-03-19 Thread Steve Snyder
On Saturday 19 March 2005 7:25 am, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Steve Snyder wrote: > > Yes. It always fails here: > > > > 2005/03/18 23:12:51| assertion failed: store_swapout.c:277: > > "mem->inmem_hi == mem->swapout.queue_offset" > > Thats an odd one.. but due to the nature of

Re: [squid-users] New Patches

2005-03-19 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Steve Snyder wrote: Yes. It always fails here: 2005/03/18 23:12:51| assertion failed: store_swapout.c:277: "mem->inmem_hi == mem->swapout.queue_offset" Thats an odd one.. but due to the nature of the bug just discovered in this patch it is hard to say exacly which symptoms ma

Re: [squid-users] New Patches

2005-03-19 Thread Steve Snyder
On Saturday 19 March 2005 3:32 am, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Steve Snyder wrote: > > Same here. > > > > Applied all 4 patches on my Linux machine and Squid would restart > > every few minutes. In cache.log is the note that a signal 6 was > > received on an assert error. > > Do

Re: [squid-users] New Patches

2005-03-19 Thread Awie
> >>> 2005/03/19 11:19:41| storeLateRelease: released 0 objects > >>> FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying. > >> > >> Can you get a stack trace of the error? > > > > This is the step that I never did before > > See the Squid FAQ on how to report bugs: > http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-

Re: [squid-users] New Patches

2005-03-19 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Awie wrote: 2005/03/19 11:19:41| storeLateRelease: released 0 objects FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying. Can you get a stack trace of the error? This is the step that I never did before See the Squid FAQ on how to report bugs: http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-11.h

Re: [squid-users] New Patches

2005-03-19 Thread Awie
> > 2005/03/19 11:19:40| Validated 18581 Entries > > 2005/03/19 11:19:40| store_swap_size = 247856k > > 2005/03/19 11:19:41| storeLateRelease: released 0 objects > > FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying. > > Can you get a stack trace of the error? This is the step that I never did before

Re: [squid-users] New Patches

2005-03-19 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Awie wrote: After applying the last 4 patches (release date March 19, 2005), my Squid died repeatly. I used aufs, so I suspect that squid-2.5.STABLE9-aufs.patch caused the problem. 2005/03/19 11:19:40| Validated 18581 Entries 2005/03/19 11:19:40| store_swap_size = 247856k 2

Re: [squid-users] New Patches

2005-03-19 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Steve Snyder wrote: Same here. Applied all 4 patches on my Linux machine and Squid would restart every few minutes. In cache.log is the note that a signal 6 was received on an assert error. Do you have the assert? Regards Henrik

Re: [squid-users] New Patches

2005-03-18 Thread Steve Snyder
Same here. Applied all 4 patches on my Linux machine and Squid would restart every few minutes. In cache.log is the note that a signal 6 was received on an assert error. I backed out the aufs path and all is well again. On Friday 18 March 2005 11:03 pm, Awie wrote: > All, > > After applying

[squid-users] New Patches

2005-03-18 Thread Awie
All, After applying the last 4 patches (release date March 19, 2005), my Squid died repeatly. I used aufs, so I suspect that squid-2.5.STABLE9-aufs.patch caused the problem. Thx & Rgds, Awie == 2005/03/19 11:19:40| Validated 18581 Entries 2005/03/19 11:19:40| store_swap_siz