Next week i need to set-up a squid server for a small company of about
18 users.
I have set-up a test system at home on a machine of similar spec ( 2ghz
512 ram and an ide disk )
I have the default config file with about half a dozen acl's.
At times browsing is really fast but now and again for
On 10/8/05, Terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Next week i need to set-up a squid server for a small company of about
> 18 users.
> I have set-up a test system at home on a machine of similar spec ( 2ghz
> 512 ram and an ide disk )
> I have the default config file with about half a dozen acl's.
> A
Mark Elsen wrote:
On 10/8/05, Terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Next week i need to set-up a squid server for a small company of about
18 users.
I have set-up a test system at home on a machine of similar spec ( 2ghz
512 ram and an ide disk )
I have the default config file with about half a do
I set the full debug then checked my cache log. The slow down seems to
be my acl
for example
acl noporn1 url_regex "/usr/local/etc/squid/noporn1"
Which is a file i picked off the web that contains a list of porn sites
about 44318 in total. Silly me :)
So that is not the way to do that
Squid's url_regex is a hideously slow way of managing blackholed
urls/sites/domains.
I'm not necessarily blaming the program itself, the fact is, regular
expressions can be quite computational.
SquidGuard, on the other hand, is VERY fast and works quite well.
Lots of folks around here swear by D
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Performance tweaks
Squid's url_regex is a hideously slow way of managing blackholed
urls/sites/domains.
I'm not necessarily blaming the program its
EMAIL PROTECTED]
"D & E Radel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/10/2005 05:40 PM
To
, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
Re: [squid-users] Performance tweaks
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:56 AM
Subject:
