On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Gregori Parker wrote:
Thanks for the answers...I forgot to mention that this deployment of
squid will be used to accelerate back-end servers and geographically
extend our CDN. I was planning to use RAID5, am I hearing this is okay
for non-proxy implementations?
Yes.
Rega
: Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:51 AM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: [squid-users] RAID, 64bit and cache_dir size
I've been reading up in preparation for a deployment of Squid into a
large enterprise cluster to extend our CDN, and I have been unable to
determine solid answers fo
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Gregori Parker wrote:
I have read that RAID is a bad idea for squid caches
For Internet proxies yes, as they rotate their cache content quite
frequently, causing a lot of small writes which most RAID setups isn't
very happy about.
For accelerators where the content is
>
> I've been reading up in preparation for a deployment of Squid into a
> large enterprise cluster to extend our CDN, and I have been unable to
> determine solid answers for the following questions. Thanks in advance
> for any insight you guys can provide.
>
> I have read that RAID is a bad ide
I've been reading up in preparation for a deployment of Squid into a
large enterprise cluster to extend our CDN, and I have been unable to
determine solid answers for the following questions. Thanks in advance
for any insight you guys can provide.
I have read that RAID is a bad idea for squid
