Re: [squid-users] RE : [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-07 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 06.06.08 18:14, GARDAIS Ionel wrote: I will try the host != some.url.com part. For the isInNet() trick, the problem is that it inducts a DNS resolution call for every request to compare with the IP/mask parameters. Don't you have local resolver? Do you think that your browser doesn't

[squid-users] RE : [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-06 Thread GARDAIS Ionel
I will try the host != some.url.com part. For the isInNet() trick, the problem is that it inducts a DNS resolution call for every request to compare with the IP/mask parameters. I was thinking to myself that it was an useless overhead... Ionel -Message d'origine- De : Matus UHLAR -

[squid-users] RE : [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-06 Thread GARDAIS Ionel
Okay ... It's been the hardest 20 minutes of the day : find a few domain names that should have not been accessed and cached by our DNS. Well, from Paris, France, time given by dig stats : - mana.pf (French Polynesia, other side of the Earth, satellite link) : around 700ms - aroundtheworld.com,

[squid-users] RE : [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-06 Thread Dean Weimer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 2:56 PM To: Henrik Nordstrom Cc: Squid Users Subject: [squid-users] RE : [squid-users] performances ... again Okay ... It's been the hardest 20 minutes of the day : find a few domain names that should have not been accessed and cached by our DNS

[squid-users] Re:[squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-05 Thread chris brain
Hi Ionel, Your performance dont look that bad. Our stats roughly work out to be : 1000+ users NTLM auth Average HTTP requests per minute since start: 2990.8 with max 30% hits. (so your hits look coparable to us.) Our cache miss service time averages to about 160ms and cache hits service time

[squid-users] RE : [squid-users] Re:[squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-05 Thread GARDAIS Ionel
-Message d'origine- De : chris brain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : jeudi 5 juin 2008 18:34 À : squid-users@squid-cache.org Objet : [squid-users] Re:[squid-users] performances ... again Hi Ionel, Your performance dont look that bad. Our stats roughly work out to be : 1000+ users NTLM

[squid-users] Re:[squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-05 Thread Dean Weimer
Administrator Orscheln Management Co -Original Message- From: GARDAIS Ionel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 12:11 PM To: chris brain; squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: [squid-users] RE : [squid-users] Re:[squid-users] performances ... again Hi Chris

Re: [squid-users] RE : [squid-users] Re:[squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-05 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
tor 2008-06-05 klockan 19:10 +0200 skrev GARDAIS Ionel: After rereading my post, I saw that I did not finish a line : [...] cache-misses median service times are around 200ms and cache-hits are around 3ms but we often see a 10-second lag for browser to start loading the page. That's usually