On 14.11.2012 04:00, Azfar Hashmi wrote:
Hi Eliezer,
My clients simply login via browser, squid just ask them for http
auth.
Your are right squid is not a NAS hence it does not respect radius
protocols other then simple authentication request. Btw I can achieve
the multi-user login check witho
Hi Eliezer,
My clients simply login via browser, squid just ask them for http auth.
Your are right squid is not a NAS hence it does not respect radius
protocols other then simple authentication request. Btw I can achieve
the multi-user login check without external_acl by using "max_user_ip
-s 1"
On 11/13/2012 3:47 PM, Azfar Hashmi wrote:
Do have any example? My problem is that I can't play with squid conf
whenever a new user is created in radius. Addition/expiration of users
should be transparent from squid.
you dont need to change squid conf more then to use some external_acl
helper (y
Do have any example? My problem is that I can't play with squid conf
whenever a new user is created in radius. Addition/expiration of users
should be transparent from squid.
On 11/13/2012 6:40 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> On 11/13/2012 3:31 PM, Azfar Hashmi wrote:
>> My scenario is simple that d
On 11/13/2012 3:31 PM, Azfar Hashmi wrote:
My scenario is simple that different customers should not be able to
login simultaneously from a same username.
Or
If username "A" is being used by x.x.x.x IP address then user "A" should
not be able to login from y.y.y.y IP address at same time.
Well
My scenario is simple that different customers should not be able to
login simultaneously from a same username.
Or
If username "A" is being used by x.x.x.x IP address then user "A" should
not be able to login from y.y.y.y IP address at same time.
On 11/13/2012 5:57 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
>
On 11/13/2012 2:40 PM, Azfar Hashmi wrote:
Thanks for the information.
It seems also impossible to control radius level simultaneous-use check
to me, can anyone confirm it?
And what do you mean by that?
To control what exactly?
Radius is for most likely used with a per IP to user level.
Elieze
Thanks for the information.
It seems also impossible to control radius level simultaneous-use check
to me, can anyone confirm it?
On 11/8/2012 5:42 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> On 11/8/2012 2:14 PM, Azfar Hashmi wrote:
>> So there is no workground except manually parsing squid logs and feeding
>
On 11/8/2012 2:14 PM, Azfar Hashmi wrote:
So there is no workground except manually parsing squid logs and feeding
radius database?
Not that I know of.
I think that most of the needed code for the option is there and also
can be fetched by SNMP.
take a look at: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Featu
On 11/7/2012 4:55 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> On 11/7/2012 1:37 PM, Azfar Hashmi wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am using Squid 2.7 Stable9 (Debian Squeeze package) and i am using
>> squid_radius_auth helper to perform authentication from radius
>> (Freeradius 2.x) and this is working fine. Now the pro
On 11/7/2012 1:37 PM, Azfar Hashmi wrote:
Hi all,
I am using Squid 2.7 Stable9 (Debian Squeeze package) and i am using
squid_radius_auth helper to perform authentication from radius
(Freeradius 2.x) and this is working fine. Now the problem is that I
want to do accounting in radius and for it I
Hi all,
I am using Squid 2.7 Stable9 (Debian Squeeze package) and i am using
squid_radius_auth helper to perform authentication from radius
(Freeradius 2.x) and this is working fine. Now the problem is that I
want to do accounting in radius and for it I need squid to send
accounting start / stop,
12 matches
Mail list logo
