[squid-users] Re: Re: Re: Cache for mp3 and ogg in memory...

2008-02-12 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2008-02-10 08:47:14, schrieb Joel Jaeggli: > If you have more than one listener for the same stream, you relay it to Which is not the case since OGG/MP3 can requested individualy. > a local streaming server (icecast2) and provide them with a link to the > local source... But this mean, you

Re: [squid-users] Re: Re: Re: Cache for mp3 and ogg in memory...

2008-02-12 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008, Michelle Konzack wrote: > But if I read the logs, they are around 150-180 files which are heared > all the time and they have in summary arround 800 MByte. So creating a > Ram-Cache of 1 GByte would do wonder... Then you should look at why your operating system disk caching

Re: [squid-users] Re: Re: Re: Cache for mp3 and ogg in memory...

2008-02-13 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008, Michelle Konzack wrote: > > But if I read the logs, they are around 150-180 files which are heared > > all the time and they have in summary arround 800 MByte. So creating a > > Ram-Cache of 1 GByte would do wonder... On 13.02.08 09:55, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Then you should

Re: [squid-users] Re: Re: Re: Cache for mp3 and ogg in memory...

2008-02-13 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> Am 2008-02-10 08:47:14, schrieb Joel Jaeggli: > > If you have more than one listener for the same stream, you relay it to On 11.02.08 01:01, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Which is not the case since OGG/MP3 can requested individualy. by using the same URI? or by different URI each time a song is r

Re: [squid-users] Re: Re: Re: Cache for mp3 and ogg in memory...

2008-02-13 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > maybe the data are never fetched from disk, always from remote server and > just always stored to the cache (to be never fetched from there). > > Or maybe the squid memory usage is too big and machine swaps... Bit hard to say without access t

Re: [squid-users] Re: Re: Re: Cache for mp3 and ogg in memory...

2008-02-13 Thread Joel Jaeggli
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: If they're all listing to different remote sources at different times then there's no point in caching it... But if I read the logs, they are around 150-180 files which are heared all the time and they have in summary arround 800 MByte. So creating a Ram-Cache of 1