Re: [squid-users] Re: Re: Windows Messenger through Squid

2010-11-05 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 06/11/10 09:45, gsand...@aol.com wrote: I've been even trying using Squid 3.2.0.2, which I manually compiled. As you know, Squid 3.2.0.2 has better support for HTTP/1.1 (I thought it was something related with that, as Squid 2.6STABLE21 uses HTTP/1.0). Now, with the sniffer I see HTTP/1.1 res

[squid-users] Re: Re: Windows Messenger through Squid

2010-11-05 Thread gsandorx
I've been even trying using Squid 3.2.0.2, which I manually compiled. As you know, Squid 3.2.0.2 has better support for HTTP/1.1 (I thought it was something related with that, as Squid 2.6STABLE21 uses HTTP/1.0). Now, with the sniffer I see HTTP/1.1 responses from Live servers through Squid (when

[squid-users] Re: Re: Windows Messenger through Squid

2010-11-05 Thread gsandorx
I've been even trying using Squid 3.2.0.2, which I manually compiled. As you know, Squid 3.2.0.2 has better support for HTTP/1.1 (I thought it was something related with that, as Squid 2.6STABLE21 uses HTTP/1.0). Now, with the sniffer I see HTTP/1.1 responses from Live servers through Squid (when w