On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:09:27 +1200, Rhys Evans wrote:
On 25 May 2011 19:17, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 25/05/11 14:10, Rhys Evans wrote:
Seeing as I don't have any neighbour caches, I set htcp_port 0 and
things seem to be OK. It still seems odd that this issue came up,
I'm
wondering if maybe
On 25 May 2011 19:17, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> On 25/05/11 14:10, Rhys Evans wrote:
>>
>> Seeing as I don't have any neighbour caches, I set htcp_port 0 and
>> things seem to be OK. It still seems odd that this issue came up, I'm
>> wondering if maybe some Windows update altered some behaviour in
On 25/05/11 14:10, Rhys Evans wrote:
Seeing as I don't have any neighbour caches, I set htcp_port 0 and
things seem to be OK. It still seems odd that this issue came up, I'm
wondering if maybe some Windows update altered some behaviour in
regard to allowing the binding required?
Looks similar t
Seeing as I don't have any neighbour caches, I set htcp_port 0 and
things seem to be OK. It still seems odd that this issue came up, I'm
wondering if maybe some Windows update altered some behaviour in
regard to allowing the binding required?
On 25 May 2011 13:58, Rhys Evans wrote:
> I've tried a
I've tried an absolutely fresh install of squid and still get a 1067
error when starting the service. There is now nothing written to
squid.exe.log but cache.log includes the text below:
2011/05/25 13:54:39| Starting Squid Cache version 2.7.STABLE8 for
i686-pc-winnt...
2011/05/25 13:54:39| Running