bump.
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/cache-peer-communication-about-HIT-MISS-between-squid-and-and-non-squid-peer-tp4600931p4642629.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Amos,
please help?
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/cache-peer-communication-about-HIT-MISS-between-squid-and-and-non-squid-peer-tp4600931p4625770.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I also found this posting from mail list:
http://www1.ro.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/201004/0015.html
http://www1.ro.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/201004/0015.html
It looks like the guy there is having the same request as I have.
What do you think about this Amos?
Actuall
i was just working on something about the cache again and i have seen
some ICP code so one of them was a ICP server on perl that can be
manipulated for the sole purpose of this non-squid peers such as apache
and nginx.
http://mirrors.xservers.ro/CPAN/authors/id/M/MH/MHAMILTON/WebCache-ICP-1.00
On 07.05.2012 19:48, x-man wrote:
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote
Waking up;
fully internally to Squid we have the X-Cache: header at present
being emitted with HIT/MISS details. You may be able to setup a
rep_header_regex ACL the scans for HIT and your upstream cache name.
Used on tcp_outgoing_tos t
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote
>
>
> Waking up;
>fully internally to Squid we have the X-Cache: header at present
> being emitted with HIT/MISS details. You may be able to setup a
> rep_header_regex ACL the scans for HIT and your upstream cache name.
> Used on tcp_outgoing_tos to set TOS value. Th
On 07.05.2012 07:15, x-man wrote:
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote
On 02.05.2012 03:12, x-man wrote:
Hello,
I have this question:
If you have squid, that is working as intercept proxy for
customers,
has
parent cache_peer (non-squid), who is not talking ICP or HTCP
procols, and
is only dealing with pa
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote
>
> On 02.05.2012 03:12, x-man wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have this question:
>>
>> If you have squid, that is working as intercept proxy for customers,
>> has
>> parent cache_peer (non-squid), who is not talking ICP or HTCP
>> procols, and
>> is only dealing with part of th
On 2/05/2012 8:44 p.m., x-man wrote:
Thanks Amos,
what will change if the cache peer is talking ICP or HTCP protocol? Can I
use one of this protocols to say if the answer is HIT or MISS, so the main
squid who is in intercept mode to the customers, will mark the traffic?
ICP and HTCP are use to
Thanks Amos,
what will change if the cache peer is talking ICP or HTCP protocol? Can I
use one of this protocols to say if the answer is HIT or MISS, so the main
squid who is in intercept mode to the customers, will mark the traffic?
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cach
10 matches
Mail list logo
