[squid-users] Re: server failover/backup

2014-08-21 Thread nuhll
This appears to be a client (192.168.0.125) connecting to what it thinks is a regular forward-proxy port: http_port 3128 or http_port 192.168.0.1:3128 Like i said the clients get the ip and port thru dhcp, thats correct behaivour in my eyes. This above shows Squid receiving various

[squid-users] Re: server failover/backup

2014-08-20 Thread nuhll
I found out why. If i go direct to http://llnw.blizzard.com/hs-pod/beta/EU/4944.direct/Updates/hs-6187-6284-Win_deDE-final.MPQ it works (without proxy). If i enable proxy, it wont work and i get 503. BTW i upgraded to Squid Cache: Version 3.3.8 -- View this message in context:

RE: [squid-users] Re: server failover/backup

2014-08-20 Thread Lawrence Pingree
] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 9:51 AM To: squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: [squid-users] Re: server failover/backup I found out why. If i go direct to http://llnw.blizzard.com/hs-pod/beta/EU/4944.direct/Updates/hs-6187-6284-Win _deDE-final.MPQ it works (without proxy). If i enable proxy

RE: [squid-users] Re: server failover/backup

2014-08-20 Thread Lawrence Pingree
...@web.de] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 9:51 AM To: squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: [squid-users] Re: server failover/backup I found out why. If i go direct to http://llnw.blizzard.com/hs-pod/beta/EU/4944.direct/Updates/hs-6187-6284-Win _deDE-final.MPQ it works (without proxy). If i enable

[squid-users] Re: server failover/backup

2014-08-20 Thread nuhll
Hello, thanks for your help. I own a dhcp server which spread the proxy ip:port to all clients (proxy settings are default search for) so all programs are using this proxy automatic for http requests. I use Linux version 3.2.0-4-amd64 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian

[squid-users] Re: server failover/backup

2014-08-20 Thread nuhll
Some Logs: == /var/log/squid3/cache.log == 2014/08/20 19:33:19.809 kid1| client_side.cc(777) swanSong: local=192.168.0.1:3128 remote=192.168.0.125:62595 flags=1 2014/08/20 19:33:20.227 kid1| client_side.cc(777) swanSong: local=192.168.0.1:3128 remote=192.168.0.125:62378 flags=1 2014/08/20

[squid-users] Re: server failover/backup

2014-08-20 Thread nuhll
I give up. Squid sucks so hard. New and easier idea: accel the sites i want to cache. But how? Information about this is crazy much http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/ReverseProxy But how to cache? # #Recommended minimum configuration: # debug_options ALL,1 33,2 # Example rule allowing

Re: [squid-users] Re: server failover/backup

2014-08-20 Thread Antony Stone
On Wednesday 20 August 2014 at 21:08:03 (EU time), nuhll wrote: accel the sites i want to cache. But how? Information about this is crazy much http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/ReverseProxy But how to cache? Simple answer - with a caching proxy server. Longer answer - accelerator

Re: [squid-users] Re: server failover/backup

2014-08-20 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 21/08/2014 7:22 a.m., Antony Stone wrote: On Wednesday 20 August 2014 at 21:08:03 (EU time), nuhll wrote: accel the sites i want to cache. But how? Information about this is crazy much http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/ReverseProxy But how to cache? Simple answer - with a

Re: [squid-users] Re: server failover/backup

2014-08-20 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 21/08/2014 5:29 a.m., nuhll wrote: Hello, thanks for your help. I own a dhcp server which spread the proxy ip:port to all clients (proxy settings are default search for) so all programs are using this proxy automatic for http requests. Not quite. Only the applications which obey DHCP

Re: [squid-users] Re: server failover/backup

2014-08-20 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 21/08/2014 5:33 a.m., nuhll wrote: Some Logs: These logs are showing a problem... == /var/log/squid3/cache.log == 2014/08/20 19:33:19.809 kid1| client_side.cc(777) swanSong: local=192.168.0.1:3128 remote=192.168.0.125:62595 flags=1 2014/08/20 19:33:20.227 kid1| client_side.cc(777)

RE: [squid-users] Re: server failover/backup

2014-08-20 Thread Lawrence Pingree
: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 12:08 PM To: squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: [squid-users] Re: server failover/backup I give up. Squid sucks so hard. New and easier idea: accel the sites i want to cache. But how? Information about this is crazy much http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq

[squid-users] Re: server failover/backup

2014-08-19 Thread nuhll
I got help by email: removed intercept from http port (bc i dont use nat) and removed quick_abort_min. (i got told it bugs sometimes) Still battle.net is not working. I cant believe im the only one with this problem... -- View this message in context:

[squid-users] Re: server failover/backup

2014-08-18 Thread nuhll
Question: why u spam my thread? -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/ONLY-Cache-certain-Websites-tp4667121p4667249.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [squid-users] Re: server failover/backup

2014-08-18 Thread Mike
On 8/18/2014 4:27 PM, nuhll wrote: Question: why u spam my thread? -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/ONLY-Cache-certain-Websites-tp4667121p4667249.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. This is an email list. I

Re: [squid-users] Re: server failover/backup

2014-08-18 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 19/08/2014 10:48 a.m., Mike wrote: On 8/18/2014 4:27 PM, nuhll wrote: Question: why u spam my thread? -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/ONLY-Cache-certain-Websites-tp4667121p4667249.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list