RE: [squid-users] SO_FAIL in store_log under high load

2007-01-19 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
fre 2007-01-19 klockan 18:02 -0500 skrev Nguyen, Khanh, INFOT: > In cache.log has some queue congestion prior to SO_FAIL appearance and > during SO_FAIL appearance: > > 2007/01/18 14:08:27| squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion No other warnings? > Should I try to lower the thread

RE: [squid-users] SO_FAIL in store_log under high load

2007-01-19 Thread Nguyen, Khanh, INFOT
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:11 PM To: Nguyen, Khanh, INFOT Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: Re: [squid-users] SO_FAIL in store_log under high load fre 2007-01-19 klockan 16:45 -0500 skrev Nguyen, Khanh, INFOT: > 1) what has caused the swap failure? Is it due

Re: [squid-users] SO_FAIL in store_log under high load

2007-01-19 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
fre 2007-01-19 klockan 16:45 -0500 skrev Nguyen, Khanh, INFOT: > 1) what has caused the swap failure? Is it due to async threads or disk > failure? Anything in cache.log? > 2) what is the optimum thread value that should one choose when compile > under async-io? Depends a bit on the hardware. Y

[squid-users] SO_FAIL in store_log under high load

2007-01-19 Thread Nguyen, Khanh, INFOT
Hi, I experience high cache miss due to swap out failure under high load. Background setup: --- I run squid 2.6 stable 4-20061009 on Redhat AS server version 4 update 3 (64 bits kernel) The server hardware is dell 2950. 4 GB Ram, 6 hard drives, each 164 GB. Virtual memory is set

RE: [squid-users] SO_Fail -1 in store.log

2005-02-09 Thread Elsen Marc
>... >... > >`updist`/src/squid -v > > This returned STABLE7. Still good. But squid -v with out > /src/ returns > STABELE6 > > Well hard to say, but that simply means that the new binary, didn't go to where it was supposed to be by make install. As stated by others, make sure tha

RE: [squid-users] SO_Fail -1 in store.log

2005-02-09 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Brad Taylor wrote: I tried to install 2.5STABLE7 but after doing .configure, make and make install I run squid -v and still STABLE6. I checked to config.log file and these look to be the only errors: How did you install 2.5.STABLE6? You need to install 2.5.STABLE7 in the exact

RE: [squid-users] SO_Fail -1 in store.log

2005-02-09 Thread Brad Taylor
> - check whether squid was build ; should be in relative >to your unpacked distribution root : > >`updist`/src/squid (so to speak) This is there. So far so good. >Check then for instance : > >`updist`/src/squid -v This returned STABLE7. Still good. But squid -v with out /sr

RE: [squid-users] SO_Fail -1 in store.log

2005-02-09 Thread Elsen Marc
> > >> What is the best approach to upgrade to 2.5.STABLE7 from > 2.5.STABLE6? > I > >> see info on how to apply patches but not a new STABLE release. > > >Just install the new version ontop of the old and restart Squid. Same > as > >when patching except that there is no doubt in what Squid

RE: [squid-users] SO_Fail -1 in store.log

2005-02-09 Thread Brad Taylor
>> What is the best approach to upgrade to 2.5.STABLE7 from 2.5.STABLE6? I >> see info on how to apply patches but not a new STABLE release. >Just install the new version ontop of the old and restart Squid. Same as >when patching except that there is no doubt in what Squid version you are >using

RE: [squid-users] SO_Fail -1 in store.log

2005-02-07 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Brad Taylor wrote: What is the best approach to upgrade to 2.5.STABLE7 from 2.5.STABLE6? I see info on how to apply patches but not a new STABLE release. Just install the new version ontop of the old and restart Squid. Same as when patching except that there is no doubt in wha

RE: [squid-users] SO_Fail -1 in store.log

2005-02-07 Thread Brad Taylor
> You need to use the latest stable release (2.5.STABLE7) to avoid this > issue. What is the best approach to upgrade to 2.5.STABLE7 from 2.5.STABLE6? I see info on how to apply patches but not a new STABLE release. Is this really the only option? I can't fix STABLE7? B

RE: [squid-users] SO_Fail -1 in store.log

2005-02-07 Thread Elsen Marc
> > I've searched the archives and looked in the definitive guide > but can't > find any solutions to SO_Fail -1 for all image files I see in my > store.log file. I know that this means squid could not save > the object > to disk. I'm trying to just cache images but my access log is showing

[squid-users] SO_Fail -1 in store.log

2005-02-07 Thread Brad Taylor
I've searched the archives and looked in the definitive guide but can't find any solutions to SO_Fail -1 for all image files I see in my store.log file. I know that this means squid could not save the object to disk. I'm trying to just cache images but my access log is showing TCP_MISS for gif fi

Re: [squid-users] SO_FAIL

2004-08-19 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Glatzel Tino wrote: Hello Squid does not save internetfiles on the harddisk. In the store.log, i see the following messages: 1092911664.677 SO_FAIL -1 AA5601EB2B243693AFEAFAEF68C230BF 200 1092911664 1092815319-1 text/html 15488/13312 GET My system is a Debian

RE: [squid-users] SO_FAIL

2004-08-19 Thread Brent Clark
Hi Can you give a brief copy and paste of the access.log And too your conf file. Kind Regards Brent Clark -Original Message- From: Glatzel Tino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 12:54 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [squid-users] SO_FAIL Hello

[squid-users] SO_FAIL

2004-08-19 Thread Glatzel Tino
Hello Squid does not save internetfiles on the harddisk. In the store.log, i see the following messages: 1092911664.677 SO_FAIL -1 AA5601EB2B243693AFEAFAEF68C230BF 200 1092911664 1092815319-1 text/html 15488/13312 GET http://www.qmail.org/ 1092911664.731 SO_FAIL -1 AA5

Re: [squid-users] How I fixed it... Re: [squid-users] SO_FAIL

2004-08-18 Thread lists
Quoting Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Now this may be due to my misunderstanding of how "cache_replacement_policy heap > > LFUDA" is supposed to work, but the comments in the config say this about it: > > > > # The heap LFUDA policy keeps popular objects in cache regardless of

Re: [squid-users] How I fixed it... Re: [squid-users] SO_FAIL

2004-08-18 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
Now this may be due to my misunderstanding of how "cache_replacement_policy heap LFUDA" is supposed to work, but the comments in the config say this about it: # The heap LFUDA policy keeps popular objects in cache regardless of # their size and thus optimizes byte hit rate at the expen

[squid-users] How I fixed it... Re: [squid-users] SO_FAIL

2004-08-18 Thread lists
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Quoting Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Sunil Mohan Ranta wrote: > > > > > > > > i am getting SO_FAIL messages in store.log > > > and no cache is being created on my system > > > the size of of cache_dir is constant at 17MB > > > > Any e

Re: [squid-users] SO_FAIL

2004-08-17 Thread lists
Quoting Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Sunil Mohan Ranta wrote: > > > > > i am getting SO_FAIL messages in store.log > > and no cache is being created on my system > > the size of of cache_dir is constant at 17MB > > Any error messages in cache.log? > > REgards > Henri

Re: [squid-users] SO_FAIL

2004-07-25 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Sunil Mohan Ranta wrote: > > i am getting SO_FAIL messages in store.log > and no cache is being created on my system > the size of of cache_dir is constant at 17MB Any error messages in cache.log? REgards Henrik

Re: [squid-users] SO_FAIL

2004-07-09 Thread squid-users
> actuall i had stable1 and it use to work fine. > i upgrated to stable5, and got this problem It seems that I have the same or a very similar problem: No problems using squid-2.5.STABLE4-20040120 and before. Object are written on disk and logged with SWAPOUT in store.log. Using squid-2.5.STABLE

RE: [squid-users] SO_FAIL

2004-07-08 Thread Elsen Marc
> > problem details > > system : fc2 > squid : stable squid/2.5.STABLE5-20040629 > lots of free space, > > actuall i had stable1 and it use to work fine. > i upgrated to stable5, and got this problem > > cache_dir is owned by squid:squid is has ug+rwx > > tail store.log > > 1089299522.640

Re: [squid-users] SO_FAIL

2004-07-08 Thread Sunil Mohan Ranta
help please no related links found in google problem details system : fc2 squid : stable squid/2.5.STABLE5-20040629 lots of free space, actuall i had stable1 and it use to work fine. i upgrated to stable5, and got this problem cache_dir is owned by squid:squid is has ug+rwx tail store.log 10892

RE: [squid-users] SO_FAIL

2004-07-07 Thread Elsen Marc
> > > i am getting SO_FAIL messages in store.log > and no cache is being created on my system > the size of of cache_dir is constant at 17MB > - Check squid's cache.log for more info. - Check your system logs too, watchout for system messages concerning for instance disk space, disk I/O,

Re: [squid-users] SO_FAIL

2004-07-07 Thread trainier
Subject: [squid-users] SO_FAIL i am getting SO_FAIL messages in store.log and no cache is being created on my system the size of of cache_dir is constant at 17MB how do i enable caching, and get rid of this SO_FAIL message ?? help please !! -- killall -9 killall http://students.iiit.net/~sunilmohan/

[squid-users] SO_FAIL

2004-07-07 Thread Sunil Mohan Ranta
i am getting SO_FAIL messages in store.log and no cache is being created on my system the size of of cache_dir is constant at 17MB how do i enable caching, and get rid of this SO_FAIL message ?? help please !! -- killall -9 killall http://students.iiit.net/~sunilmohan/