On 01/13/2010 10:30 AM, Dimitri Syuoul wrote:
Ive been reading over this new feature. It is unclear to me if this
can be used for transparently proxying SSL (by this I mean not
configuring any proxy in the computers of the clients.. it is ok if
clients get cert warnings).
Yes, SSL
- Original Message -
On 01/13/2010 10:30 AM, Dimitri Syuoul wrote:
Hello,
Ive been reading over this new feature. It is unclear to me if this
can be used for transparently proxying SSL (by this I mean not
configuring any proxy in the computers of the clients.. it is ok if
On 01/13/2010 10:30 AM, Dimitri Syuoul wrote:
Hello,
Ive been reading over this new feature. It is unclear to me if this
can be used for transparently proxying SSL (by this I mean not
configuring any proxy in the computers of the clients.. it is ok if
clients get cert warnings).
Yes, SSL
Alex,
Thank you... for the inmense amount of users who have been waiting
years.. is there any opportunity that you can release a patch to the
stable version for this feature to be enabled.. so that we dont have
to compile the 3.1 beta?
Do you know of any opensource alternatives to this solution?
On 01/19/2010 05:57 PM, Dimitri Syuoul wrote:
Thank you... for the inmense amount of users who have been waiting
years.. is there any opportunity that you can release a patch to the
stable version for this feature to be enabled.. so that we dont have
to compile the 3.1 beta?
Sorry, but our
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 01/19/2010 05:57 PM, Dimitri Syuoul wrote:
Thank you... for the inmense amount of users who have been waiting
years.. is there any opportunity that you can release a patch to the
stable version for this feature to be enabled.. so that we dont have
to compile the 3.1
