On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Checked the duplex and both were auto. Set both to full and still have
> > the same problem. (HP server w/Intel NIC, Cisco switch).
> >
> > Any one else have any ideas?
>
> Maybe tcpdump to inspect
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Russ Uhte wrote:
Actually, the new Cisco recommendation is to make sure that all devices that
can autonegotiate are setup to autonegatiate. Hard coding speed/duplex is
now considered obsolete and should only be used in very rare circumstances,
or with older hardware/drivers
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Checked the duplex and both were auto. Set both to full and still have the same
problem. (HP server w/Intel NIC, Cisco switch).
Any one else have any ideas?
Maybe tcpdump to inspect the traffic to try to figure out what is going
on?
Regards
Henrik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Checked the duplex and both were auto. Set both to full and still have the same problem. (HP server w/Intel NIC, Cisco switch).
Actually, the new Cisco recommendation is to make sure that all devices
that can autonegotiate are setup to autonegatiate. Hard coding
speed/du
> CC: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Slow file download / read_timeout
>
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I have a problem that I cant seem to figure out, hopefully somone can help.
> >
> > I have a single proxy server wh
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a problem that I cant seem to figure out, hopefully somone can help.
I have a single proxy server which does not cache and all users are forced to
go through for internet access. A few users have to download msword, excel and
other random files fr
I have a problem that I cant seem to figure out, hopefully somone can help.
I have a single proxy server which does not cache and all users are forced to
go through for internet access. A few users have to download msword, excel and
other random files from several remote webservers (different netw