[squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-12 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
I'm running squid in this setup: client -> squid -> dansguardian -> squid -> teh interwebs When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100 dansguardian processes. Today, after switching both to 3.1.0.14, I'm seeing a constant 252 dansguardian processes (the maximum). Is squid-3

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-12 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Ralf Hildebrandt : > I'm running squid in this setup: > > client -> squid -> dansguardian -> squid -> teh interwebs > > When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100 > dansguardian processes. Today, after switching both to 3.1.0.14, I'm > seeing a constant 252 dansguardian p

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-12 Thread Amos Jeffries
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: I'm running squid in this setup: client -> squid -> dansguardian -> squid -> teh interwebs When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100 dansguardian processes. Today, after switching both to 3.1.0.14, I'm seeing a constant 252 dansguardian processes

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-12 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Amos Jeffries : > Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > >I'm running squid in this setup: > > > >client -> squid -> dansguardian -> squid -> teh interwebs > > > >When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100 > >dansguardian processes. Today, after switching both to 3.1.0.14, I'm > >seeing

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-12 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
mån 2009-10-12 klockan 16:48 +0200 skrev Ralf Hildebrandt: > * Amos Jeffries : > > Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > >I'm running squid in this setup: > > > > > >client -> squid -> dansguardian -> squid -> teh interwebs > > > > > >When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100 > > >dan

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-14 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> > > Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > > >I'm running squid in this setup: > > > > > > > >client -> squid -> dansguardian -> squid -> teh interwebs > > > > > > > >When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100 > > > >dansguardian processes. Today, after switching both to 3.1.0.14, I'm

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-14 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas : > so the problem was not "3.1 uses too many connections" but "2.7 drops > connections when it should not". > A bit funny ;) I made some more experiments and found out that the problem is between the Squid in front of dansguardian. client -> squid_in_front -> dansguardi

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-14 Thread Amos Jeffries
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * Matus UHLAR - fantomas : so the problem was not "3.1 uses too many connections" but "2.7 drops connections when it should not". A bit funny ;) I made some more experiments and found out that the problem is between the Squid in front of dansguardian. client -> squid_

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-20 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Ralf Hildebrandt : > * Matus UHLAR - fantomas : > > > so the problem was not "3.1 uses too many connections" but "2.7 drops > > connections when it should not". > > A bit funny ;) > > I made some more experiments and found out that the problem is between > the Squid in front of dansguardian. >