RE: [squid-users] Squid & CARP

2004-12-12 Thread Scott Phalen
So what exacly do you see regarding the requested URL when the request gets forwarded from one of the CARP servers to squid1? Do you see a single request, or multiplie requests for the same URL? If you see a single DIRECT entry then you then you most likely have something in your network inter

RE: [squid-users] Squid & CARP

2004-12-12 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Scott Phalen wrote: On squid2 and squid3 I am seeing the timeout_direct message in the access.log. Nothing else? Yes, I am seeing all the normal traffic, just the timeout_direct stood out in the access.log. So what exacly do you see regarding the requested URL when the request

RE: [squid-users] Squid & CARP

2004-12-12 Thread Scott Phalen
>This can't be your running configuration. With this configuration peers >won't be used at all as you are forcing all requests going direct via >always_direct. With this configuration access.log MUST say >DIRECT/xx.xx.xx.xx or cache hits only, never TIMEOUT_* or any peering >related tags as pee

RE: [squid-users] Squid & CARP

2004-12-12 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Scott Phalen wrote: Squid1 http_port 3128 cache_peer carp1.mydomain.com parent 3128 0 carp-load-factor=0.4 cache_peer carp2.mydomain.com parent 3128 0 carp-load-factor=0.6 Ok. Squid2 (carp1) http_port 3128 icp_port 3130 cache_peer carp2.mydomain.com sibling 3128 3130 proxy-only

RE: [squid-users] Squid & CARP

2004-12-11 Thread Scott Phalen
Are you sure you are looking into the correct squid.conf on your squid2 & squid3? You can only see TIMEOUT_DIRECT in access.log if you have ICP enabled cache_peer:s defined (cache_peer:s not using the no-query option), and requests only get forwarded to another peer if there is cache_peer dire

RE: [squid-users] Squid & CARP

2004-12-11 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Scott Phalen wrote: The odd thing is, there is no cache_peer or cache_peer_access directive telling squid2 or squid3 anything about squid1. I have been all over the configurations trying to figure out why 2 or 3 would send their data back to squid1. I am seeing "timeout_direc

RE: [squid-users] Squid & CARP

2004-12-11 Thread Scott Phalen
> But what I am seeing > in my access.log on squid is both squid2 and squid3 are sending queries back > to squid1 (causing a loop). How can I tell squid2 and squid3 to not query > squid1. squid2 and squid3 should not have any cache_peer directives telling them to contact squid1. Regards Henrik

Re: [squid-users] Squid & CARP

2004-12-11 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Scott Phalen wrote: | -- squid2 | Clients -> squid1 --|| - Internet | -- squid3 | I have cache_peer directives for squid2 and squid3 (both parents) in the squid1.conf. ca

[squid-users] Squid & CARP

2004-12-11 Thread Scott Phalen
I am running Squid2.5STABLE6 on RedHat AS2.1 and ES3.0. I am trying to use CARP to load balance my traffic. I am looking for advice from the Gurus. I bought the book and have read the FAQs, but if anyone has some pointers it would be great. Below is a description of my set-up.