Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.x and right configuration parameters for tmpfs 8GB

2011-12-02 Thread Josef Karliak
Hi, I use 64-bit machine, HP DL380 G7. I thought that it should be better to use tmpfs (part of the memory). After reboot it is clean and empty, squid creates directories again automaticaly. So you recommend use a few of disk capacity and set caching to memory only ? Thanks J.K.

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.x and right configuration parameters for tmpfs 8GB

2011-12-02 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 2/12/2011 11:10 p.m., Josef Karliak wrote: Hi, I use 64-bit machine, HP DL380 G7. I thought that it should be better to use tmpfs (part of the memory). After reboot it is clean and empty, squid creates directories again automaticaly. So you recommend use a few of disk capacity and set

[squid-users] Squid 3.1.x and right configuration parameters for tmpfs 8GB

2011-12-01 Thread Josef Karliak
Hi there, I wanna use tmpfs for squid cache, is 8GB enough or too big ? We've about 3000 computers behind squid, for OS is 16GB sufficient, that's why I used 8GB for squid tmpfs. Thanks for answers. J.K. -- Ma domena pouziva zabezpeceni a kontrolu SPF (www.openspf.org) a

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.x and right configuration parameters for tmpfs 8GB

2011-12-01 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 01.12.11 15:05, Josef Karliak wrote: I wanna use tmpfs for squid cache, is 8GB enough or too big ? We've about 3000 computers behind squid, for OS is 16GB sufficient, that's why I used 8GB for squid tmpfs. what is the point of using tmpfs as squid cache? I think using only memory cache

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.x and right configuration parameters for tmpfs 8GB

2011-12-01 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 2/12/2011 5:13 a.m., Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 01.12.11 15:05, Josef Karliak wrote: I wanna use tmpfs for squid cache, is 8GB enough or too big ? We've about 3000 computers behind squid, for OS is 16GB sufficient, that's why I used 8GB for squid tmpfs. what is the point of using